Prevalence and severity of low back- and pelvic girdle pain in pregnant Nepalese women
- PMID: 31307421
- PMCID: PMC6631866
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2398-0
Prevalence and severity of low back- and pelvic girdle pain in pregnant Nepalese women
Abstract
Background: Low back pain (LBP) and pelvic girdle pain (PGP) are commonly reported during pregnancy and are known to affect pregnant women's well-being. Still, these conditions are often considered to be a normal part of pregnancy. This study assesses the prevalence and severity of LBP and/or PGP among pregnant Nepalese women, as well as exploring factors associated with LBP and PGP.
Methods: A cross-sectional study with successive recruitment of pregnant women was conducted at two district hospitals in Nepal from May 2016 to May 2017. The data was collected using self-reported questionnaires. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the associations between independent variables and LBP and/or PGP.
Results: A total of 1284 pregnant women were included in the study. The reported prevalence of pregnancy-related LBP and/or PGP was 34%. Pain intensity was high with a mean score (standard deviation) of 6 (2). The median (25th-75th percentiles) disability scores according to the total Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index were 20 (10-32) and 30 (21-38), respectively. Even though only 52% of the women believed that the pain would disappear after delivery, concern about LBP and/or PGP was reported to be low (median 2 (0-4) (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10)). In the final model for women with LBP and/or PGP the adjusted odds ratios were for body mass index (20-24, 25-30, > 30) 0.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44-1.21), 1.1 (95% CI, 0.66-1.83), and 1.5 (95% CI, 0.78-2.94) respectively, for pelvic organ prolapse symptoms 6.6 (95% CI, 4.93-8.95) and for women with educated husbands (primary or secondary, higher secondary or above) 1.1 (95% CI, 0.53-2.16) and 1.7 (95% CI, 0.84-3.47), respectively.
Conclusions: Pregnant Nepalese women commonly report LBP and/or PGP. The women experienced low disability despite severe pain intensity and poor beliefs in recovery after delivery.
Keywords: Function; Impact; Low back pain; Nepal; Pelvic girdle pain; Pelvic pain; Pregnancy; Prevalence; Severity; Women’s health.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The Severity and Impact of Pelvic Girdle Pain and Low-Back Pain in Pregnancy: A Multinational Study.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Apr;27(4):510-517. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6342. Epub 2017 Aug 23. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018. PMID: 28832267
-
Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: a multicenter study conducted in the Spanish National Health Service.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 1;37(17):1516-33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824dcb74. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22333958
-
Prevalence of Antenatal Depressive Symptoms and its Associated Factors among Pregnant Nepalese Women with and Without Low Back- and/or Pelvic Girdle Pain.J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2022 Mar 13;19(4):784-791. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i04.3849. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2022. PMID: 35615838
-
Exercise for the prevention and treatment of low back, pelvic girdle and lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;53(2):90-98. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099400. Epub 2018 Oct 18. Br J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30337344
-
Chiropractic Care of Adults With Postpartum-Related Low Back, Pelvic Girdle, or Combination Pain: A Systematic Review.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Sep;43(7):732-743. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Aug 30. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020. PMID: 32873418
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for pregnancy-related low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heliyon. 2023 Jul 25;9(8):e18439. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18439. eCollection 2023 Aug. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37593601 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge Mapping Analysis of Research on Pregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle Pain (PPGP) from 2002 to 2022 Using Bibliometrics.J Pain Res. 2024 Feb 13;17:643-666. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S431438. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 38371481 Free PMC article.
-
Lumbopelvic pain and sick leave during pregnancy: A comparison of Italy and Norway.Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231218197. doi: 10.1177/17455057231218197. Womens Health (Lond). 2023. PMID: 38078361 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Feb;103(2):225-240. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14714. Epub 2023 Nov 23. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024. PMID: 37997035 Free PMC article.
-
Potential role of physical labor and cultural views of menstruation in high incidence of pelvic organ prolapse in Nepalese women: a comparative study across the menstrual cycle.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 29;11:1265067. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1265067. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38487031 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, Zhang S, Moller AB, Gemmill A, Fat DM, Boerma T, Temmerman M, Mathers C, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN maternal mortality estimation inter-agency group. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462–474. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous