Do we understand the intervention? What complex intervention research can teach us for the evaluation of clinical ethics support services (CESS)
- PMID: 31307458
- PMCID: PMC6633613
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0381-y
Do we understand the intervention? What complex intervention research can teach us for the evaluation of clinical ethics support services (CESS)
Abstract
Background: Evaluating clinical ethics support services (CESS) has been hailed as important research task. At the same time, there is considerable debate about how to evaluate CESS appropriately. The criticism, which has been aired, refers to normative as well as empirical aspects of evaluating CESS.
Main body: In this paper, we argue that a first necessary step for progress is to better understand the intervention(s) in CESS. Tools of complex intervention research methodology may provide relevant means in this respect. In a first step, we introduce principles of "complex intervention research" and show how CESS fulfil the criteria of "complex interventions". In a second step, we develop a generic "conceptual framework" for "ethics consultation on request" as standard for many forms of ethics consultation in clinical ethics practice. We apply this conceptual framework to the model of "bioethics mediation" to make explicit the specific structural and procedural elements of this form of ethics consultation on request. In a final step we conduct a comparative analysis of two different types of CESS, which have been subject to evaluation research: "proactive ethics consultation" and "moral case deliberation" and discuss implications for evaluating both types of CESS.
Conclusion: To make explicit different premises of implemented CESS interventions by means of conceptual frameworks can inform the search for sound empirical evaluation of CESS. In addition, such work provides a starting point for further reflection about what it means to offer "good" CESS.
Keywords: Clinical ethics support services; Complex intervention research; Conceptual framework; Ethics consultation; Evaluation research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Evaluation of clinical ethics support services and its normativity.J Med Ethics. 2013 Nov;39(11):681-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100697. Epub 2013 Jan 17. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23328983
-
Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support: A Participatory Approach.Bioethics. 2017 May;31(4):258-266. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12348. Bioethics. 2017. PMID: 28417517
-
Methodological Reflections on the Contribution of Qualitative Research to the Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Support Services.Bioethics. 2017 May;31(4):237-245. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12347. Bioethics. 2017. PMID: 28417519
-
Negotiating the moral order: paradoxes of ethics consultation.Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Jun;5(2):89-112. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0066. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995. PMID: 10143184 Review.
-
Clinical Ethics Support for Healthcare Personnel: An Integrative Literature Review.HEC Forum. 2017 Dec;29(4):313-346. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9325-4. HEC Forum. 2017. PMID: 28600658 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Moral competence, moral teamwork and moral action - the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcomes (Euro-MCD) Instrument 2.0 and its revision process.BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 2;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00493-3. BMC Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32616048 Free PMC article.
-
Should Artificial Intelligence be used to support clinical ethical decision-making? A systematic review of reasons.BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 6;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00929-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37415172 Free PMC article.
-
Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e039263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039263. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33257482 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical ethics case consultation in a university department of cardiology and intensive care: a descriptive evaluation of consultation protocols.BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 23;22(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00668-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 34301238 Free PMC article.
-
CURA: A clinical ethics support instrument for caregivers in palliative care.Nurs Ethics. 2022 Nov-Dec;29(7-8):1562-1577. doi: 10.1177/09697330221074014. Epub 2022 May 27. Nurs Ethics. 2022. PMID: 35622018 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fletcher JC, Siegler M. What are the goals of ethics consultation? A consensus statement. J Clin Ethics. 1996;7:122–126. - PubMed
-
- Bundesärztekammer. Stellungnahme der Zentralen Kommission zur Wahrung ethischer Grundsätze in der Medizin und ihren Grenzgebieten (Zentrale Ethikkommission) bei der Bundesärztekammer zur Ethikberatung in der klinischen Medizin. Dtsch Arztebl. 2006;103:1703–7.
-
- Council of Europe. Guide on the decision-making process regarding medical treatment in end-of-life situations. 2014. http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/conferences_and_symposia/Guide%2.... Accessed 20 May 2019.
-
- Royal College of Physicians. Ethics in practice: background and recommendations for enhanced suppport: report of a working party. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2005.
-
- Ackermann S, Balsiger L, Salathé M. Ethikstrukturen an Akutspitälern, Psychiatrischen Kliniken und Rehabilitationskliniken in der Schweiz. Bioethica Forum. 2016;9:52–59.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources