Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug:117:171-177.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

Preoperative breast MRI features associated with positive or close margins in breast-conserving surgery

Affiliations

Preoperative breast MRI features associated with positive or close margins in breast-conserving surgery

Min Sun Bae et al. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features associated with positive or close margins in patients with breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

Materials and methods: A retrospective review identified 249 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) who underwent preoperative MRI and BCS as a primary procedure between 2008 and 2010. The MR images were reviewed for descriptions of findings with no new interpretations made. Margins were defined as positive (tumor touching the inked specimen margin), close (<2 mm tumor-free margin), or negative (≥2 mm tumor-free margin). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate imaging and clinical factors predictive of positive or close margins.

Results: Of the 249 patients, 83 (33.3%) had positive or close margins and 166 (66.7%) had negative margins on the initial BCS specimen. Multivariate analysis showed that multifocal disease (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.9-12.2; p = 0.001), nonmass enhancement lesion (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-6.2, p = 0.003), greater background parenchymal enhancement (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.6; p = 0.023), larger lesion size (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7, p = 0.032), and presence of ductal carcinoma in situ on needle biopsy (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.6; p = 0.008) were independent predictors of positive or close margins.

Conclusions: Multifocal disease, nonmass enhancement lesion, or greater background parenchymal enhancement on preoperative breast MRI were significantly associated with positive or close margins. Identifying these MRI features before surgery can be helpful to reduce the reoperation rate in BCS.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Preoperative MRI; Resection margins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: Dr. Elizabeth Morris has research support from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and the Susan G. Komen.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Graph shows the receiver operating characteristic curve for the multivariate model.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
45-year-old woman with breast cancer and positive surgical margins. Sagittal T1-weighted fat-suppressed postcontrast (A and B) and sagittal subtraction maximum intensity projection (C) MR images of left breast show 3 cm clumped nonmass enhancement containing the signal void artifact from a biopsy clip (arrows) and multifocal disease (arrowheads) in the upper outer quadrant. Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were diagnosed in the biopsy specimen. Patient underwent MR-guided needle localization. Surgical margins were focally positive for IDC and DCIS. Pathology revealed three foci of IDC.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
58-year-old woman with breast cancer and negative surgical margins. Sagittal T1-weighted fat-suppressed postcontrast (A), sagittal postcontrast subtraction (B), and sagittal subtraction maximum intensity projection (C) MR images of left breast show 1.5 cm irregular enhancing mass (arrows) in the lower outer quadrant. There is no evidence of multifocal disease. Absence of ductal carcinoma in situ was noted in the biopsy specimen. Pathology revealed unifocal invasive ductal carcinoma with negative surgical margins.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 1227–1232. - PubMed
    1. Landercasper J, Whitacre E, Degnim AC, Al-Hamadani M. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Mastery(SM) database. Ann Surg Oncol 21 (2014) 3185–3191. - PubMed
    1. Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M. The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 21 (2014) 717–730. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 366 (2005) 2087–2106. - PubMed
    1. Wilke LG, Czechura T, Wang C, et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg 149 (2014) 1296–1305. - PubMed