Workload impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for patients with diabetes: an interrupted time series in general practice
- PMID: 31308001
- PMCID: PMC6650130
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X704645
Workload impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for patients with diabetes: an interrupted time series in general practice
Abstract
Background: There are substantial concerns about GP workload. The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) has been perceived by both professionals and patients as bureaucratic, but the full impact of the QOF on GP workload is not well known.
Aim: To assess the impact of the QOF on GP consultation rates for patients with diabetes mellitus.
Design and setting: This study used interrupted time series of 13 248 745 general practice consultations for 37 065 patients with diabetes mellitus in England.
Method: Clinical Practice Research Datalink general practice data were used from 2000/2001 to 2014/2015, with introduction of the QOF (1 April 2004) as the intervention, and mean annual GP consultation rates as the primary outcome.
Results: Mean annual GP clinical consultation rates were 8.10 per patient in 2000/2001, 6.91 in 2004/2005, and 7.09 in 2014/2015. Introduction of the QOF was associated with an annual change in the trend of GP clinical consultation rates of 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.69, P = 0.001) consultations per patient, giving a post-QOF trend increasing by 0.018 consultations per year. Introduction of the QOF was associated with an immediate stepped increase of 'other' out-of-hours and non-clinical encounters, and trend change of 0.57 (95% CI = 0.34 to 0.81, P<0.001) per year, resulting in a post-QOF trend increasing by 0.27 other encounters per year.
Conclusion: Introduction of the QOF was associated with a modest increase in clinical GP consultation rates and substantial increase in other encounters for patients with diabetes independent of changes in diabetes prevalence. National prevalence of diabetes increased by 90.7% from 2004/2005 to 2014/2015, which, combined with this study's findings, means GPs would have provided nearly double the number of consultations for patients with diabetes over this timescale.
Keywords: diabetes mellitus; incentives; primary care; workload.
© British Journal of General Practice 2019.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Comparison of rural and urban French GPs' activity: a cross-sectional study.Rural Remote Health. 2021 Sep;21(3):5865. doi: 10.22605/RRH5865. Epub 2021 Sep 1. Rural Remote Health. 2021. PMID: 34469693
-
Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 16;5(12):e008650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008650. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26674496 Free PMC article.
-
General practitioners' consultation counts and associated factors in Swiss primary care - A retrospective observational study.PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0227280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227280. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31891635 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosing and providing initial management for patients with Gestational Diabetes: What is the General Practitioner's experience?Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;166:108290. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108290. Epub 2020 Jun 29. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020. PMID: 32615279 Review.
-
Workload and workflow implications associated with the use of electronic clinical decision support tools used by health professionals in general practice: a scoping review.BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 20;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01973-2. BMC Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 36670354 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
GP's perspectives on laboratory test use for monitoring long-term conditions: an audit of current testing practice.BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 5;21(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01331-6. BMC Fam Pract. 2020. PMID: 33278890 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of prevention in primary care on costs in primary and secondary care for people with serious mental illness.Health Econ. 2023 Feb;32(2):343-355. doi: 10.1002/hec.4623. Epub 2022 Oct 30. Health Econ. 2023. PMID: 36309945 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of cardiovascular drug-related adverse drug reactions consultations in UK primary care: A cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 24;19(7):e0307237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307237. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39046945 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of electronic clinical decision support systems: a qualitative interview study with UK general practitioners.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 21;21(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01557-z. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021. PMID: 34154580 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of UK Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance programme on quality of primary care: systematic review with quantitative synthesis.BMJ. 2025 Jun 25;389:e083424. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083424. BMJ. 2025. PMID: 40562441 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gibson J, Sutton M, Spooner S, Checkland K. Ninth National GP Worklife Survey. 2017. PRUComm. http://blogs.lshtm.ac.uk/prucomm/files/2018/05/Ninth-National-GP-Worklif... (accessed 3 Jul 2019)
-
- Guthrie B, Tang J. What did we learn from 12 years of QOF? Scottish School of Primary Care. 2016 http://www.sspc.ac.uk/media/media_547662_en.pdf (accessed 3 Jul 2019)
-
- Roland M. Linking physicians’ pay to the quality of care — a major experiment in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1448–1454. - PubMed
-
- NHS Employers Quality and Outcomes Framework. 2017. https://www.nhsemployers.org/pay-pensions-and-reward/primary-care-contac... (accessed 2 Jul 2019)
-
- Health and Social Care Information Centre QOF 2004/05 background. 2012 https://nhsenglandfilestore.s3.amazonaws.com/qof/a650e6029e3765278410889... (accessed 3 Jul 2019)
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous