Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;76(9):680-687.
doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105744. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

Validity of retrospective occupational exposure estimates of lead and manganese in a case-control study

Jean-François Sauvé  1 , Joemy M Ramsay  1   2 , Sarah J Locke  1 , Pamela J Dopart  1 , Pabitra R Josse  1 , Dennis D Zaebst  3 , Paul S Albert  4 , Kenneth P Cantor  1 , Dalsu Baris  1 , Brian P Jackson  5 , Margaret R Karagas  6 , Gm Monawar Hosain  7 , Molly Schwenn  8 , Alison Johnson  9 , Mark P Purdue  1 , Stella Koutros  1 , Debra T Silverman  1 , Melissa C Friesen  1
Affiliations

Validity of retrospective occupational exposure estimates of lead and manganese in a case-control study

Jean-François Sauvé et al. Occup Environ Med. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: The validity of surrogate measures of retrospective occupational exposure in population-based epidemiological studies has rarely been evaluated. Using toenail samples as bioindicators of exposure, we assessed whether work tasks and expert assessments of occupational metal exposure obtained from personal interviews were associated with lead and manganese concentrations.

Methods: We selected 609 controls from a case-control study of bladder cancer in New England who had held a job for ≥1 year 8-24 months prior to toenail collection. We evaluated associations between toenail metal concentrations and five tasks extracted from occupational questionnaires (grinding, painting, soldering, welding, working near engines) using linear regression models. For 139 subjects, we also evaluated associations between the toenail concentrations and exposure estimates from three experts.

Results: We observed a 1.9-fold increase (95% CI 1.4 to 2.5) in toenail lead concentrations with painting and 1.4-fold increase (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7) in manganese concentrations with working around engines and handling fuel. We observed significant trends with increasing frequency of both activities. For lead, significant trends were observed with the ratings from all three experts. Their average ratings showed the strongest association, with subjects rated as possibly or probably exposed to lead having concentrations that were 2.0 and 2.5 times higher, respectively, than in unexposed subjects (ptrend <0.001). Expert estimates were only weakly associated with manganese toenail concentrations.

Conclusions: Our findings support the ability of experts to identify broad contrasts in previous occupational exposure to lead. The stronger associations with task frequency and expert assessments support using refined exposure characterisation whenever possible.

Keywords: biological monitoring; lead; metals; retrospective exposure assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Teschke K, Olshan AF, Daniels JL et al. Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: opportunities for improvement. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:575–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ge CB, Friesen MC, Kromhout H et al. Use and Reliability of Exposure Assessment Methods in Occupational Case–Control Studies in the General Population: Past, Present, and Future. Ann Work Expo Health 2018;62:1047–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DellaValle CT, Purdue MP, Ward MH et al. Validity of Expert Assigned Retrospective Estimates of Occupational Polychlorinated Biphenyl Exposure. Ann Occup Hyg 2015;59:609–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benke G, Sim M, Forbes A et al. Retrospective assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals in community-based studies: validity and repeatability of industrial hygiene panel ratings. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:635–42. - PubMed
    1. Fritschi L, Nadon L, Benke G et al. Validation of expert assessment of occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med 2003;43:519–22. - PubMed

Publication types