Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):377-384.
doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.377. eCollection 2019.

Health Policy Engagement Strategy for the Health Information Technology Policy Project of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Health Policy Engagement Strategy for the Health Information Technology Policy Project of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research

Tiffany Zellner Lawrence et al. Ethn Dis. .

Abstract

Rulemaking is one of the most important ways the federal government makes public policy. It frequently has significant impact on individuals, communities, and organizations. Yet, few of those directly affected are familiar with the rulemaking process, and even fewer understand how it works. This article describes a case study of the Transdisciplinary Collaborative Center for Health Disparities Research Health Information Technology (TCC HIT) Policy Project's approach to health-policy engagement using: 1) social media; and 2) a webinar to educate stakeholders on the rulemaking process and increase their level of meaningful engagement with the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) proposed rule public comment submission. The webinar "Paying for Quality: What Is the Impact on Health Equity" was promoted through Twitter and held in June 2016. In total, we posted 19 tweets using two distinct hashtags (#MACRA4Equity, #MACRA2Equity) to raise awareness of the upcoming MACRA proposed rule and its possible effects on health equity. Overall, 252 individuals registered for the webinar, and more than half participated (n=133). Most (67%) registrants reported that health policy was not the primary focus of their current position. Based on information provided in the webinar, 95% agreed that their understanding of the topic improved. By the end of the webinar, 44% of participants indicated that they planned to submit public comments for MACRA, a 12% increase compared with those who planned to submit at the time of registration. The TCC health-policy engagement strategy demonstrates the feasibility of engaging a diverse audience around health policy issues, particularly those who are not typically engaged in policy work.

Keywords: Evidence-Based Health Policy; Health Policy; MACRA; Social Media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Timeline for the adoption of and administrative rulemaking process for the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):2. 10.1186/1472-6963-14-210.1186/1472-6963-14-2 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yackee SW. Assessing regulatory participation by health professionals: A study of state health rulemaking. Public Adm Rev. 2013;73(s1):S105-S114. 10.1111/puar.12080 - DOI
    1. Crow DA, Albright EA, Koebele E. Public information and regulatory processes: what the public knows and regulators decide. Rev Policy Res. 2016;33(1):90-109. 10.1111/ropr.12154 - DOI
    1. Shapiro S. Does the amount of participation matter? Public comments, agency responses and the time to finalize a regulation. Policy Sci. 2008;41(1):33-49. 10.1007/s11077-007-9051-x - DOI
    1. Ervin AM, Taylor HA, Ehrhardt S, Meinert CL. Why public comments matter: the case of the National Institutes of Health policy on single institutional review board review of multicenter studies. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1157-1161. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002206 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources