Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 1:11:87-100.
doi: 10.2147/JHL.S211109. eCollection 2019.

Network analysis of the structure of inter-professional knowledge exchange related to Electronic Health Record Medication Reconciliation within a Social Knowledge Networking system

Affiliations

Network analysis of the structure of inter-professional knowledge exchange related to Electronic Health Record Medication Reconciliation within a Social Knowledge Networking system

P Rangachari et al. J Healthc Leadersh. .

Abstract

Background: In fall 2016, a 2-year grant was secured to pilot a Social Knowledge Networking (SKN) system pertaining to Electronic Health Record (EHR) Medication Reconciliation (MedRec), to enable Augusta University Health System to progress from "limited use" of EHR MedRec technology, to "meaningful use" (MU). A total of 50 "SKN users" (practitioners), participated in discussing practice issues related to EHR MedRec, over a 1-year period. These discussions were moderated by five "SKN moderators" (senior administrators). The pilot study, completed in fall 2018, found that inter-professional knowledge exchanges on the SKN, enabled several collective learning ("aha") moments to emerge. These learning dynamics in turn, were associated with distinct improvement trends in two measures of MU of EHR MedRec technology, identified for the study. A key takeaway was that an SKN could be a valuable tool in enabling MU of EHR MedRec technology.

Purpose: The study's key findings related to the content and dynamics of inter-professional knowledge exchange on the SKN system, and their association with trends in measures of MU of EHR MedRec technology, have been described in a separate publication. This paper seeks to describe the structure of inter-professional knowledge exchange (or the pattern of connections) related to EHR MedRec, over the 1-year SKN period.

Methods: Social network analysis (SNA) techniques were used to describe the structure of inter-professional knowledge exchange on the SKN system.

Results: Results revealed that three of the five SKN moderators played a strong "collective brokerage" role in facilitating inter-professional knowledge exchange related to EHR MedRec, to enable learning and practice change. Together, they played complementary roles in reinforcing best-practice assertions, providing IT system education, and synthesizing collective learning moments, to enable "champions for change" to emerge from among SKN users.

Conclusion: Results provide insight into the structure of effective knowledge-sharing networks for enabling inter-professional learning and practice change in health care organizations.

Keywords: change implementation; electronic health records; inter-professional learning; meaningful use; medication reconciliation; social network analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two-mode analysis of structure of participation across all threads-of-discussion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Network map of all Social Knowledge Networking system participants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ego network maps of participation within the four most voluminous threads-of-discussion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Patient safety primer: medication reconciliation; 2016. Available from: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/1/medication-reconciliation Accessed October15, 2017.
    1. Barnsteiner JH. Medication Reconciliation In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Clinicians. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. Chapter 38. Available from. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2648/. Accessed October 15, 2015.
    1. CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Stage 2 eligible professional meaningful use core measures measure 14 of 17; 2012. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePro.... Accessed October 15, 2015.
    1. HealthIT.Gov. Achieving meaningful use stage 2: medication reconciliation; 2014. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/achieve-meaningful-use/.... Accessed October 01, 2015.
    1. Boockvar KS, Santos SL, Kushniruk A, Johnson C, Nebeker JR. Medication reconciliation: barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of physicians and pharmacists. J Hosp Med. 2011;6:329–337. doi:10.1002/jhm.891 - DOI - PubMed