Early and midterm results of treatment of giant internal carotid artery paraclinoid aneurysms with trapping and flow diverters
- PMID: 31309305
- DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-04002-3
Early and midterm results of treatment of giant internal carotid artery paraclinoid aneurysms with trapping and flow diverters
Abstract
Background: Flow diverter devices (FDD) carry risks of postoperative complications when treating aneurysms with wide necks, stenosis, and severe tortuosity of the parent vessel. In this study, we evaluated early and midterm results for the treatment of giant paraclinoid aneurysms managed by trapping and endovascular deployment of FDD.
Methods: Medical records were analyzed for patients with giant paraclinoid aneurysms treated between July 2008 and December 2017 at National Centre for Neurosurgery with either a flow diverter or by trapping the aneurysm with or without extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery. We recorded age, sex, clinical presentation, treatment modality, morbidity, and mortality. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a modified Rankin scale (mRS).
Results: Among 29 consecutive patients, 13 were treated with FDD, and 16 patients were managed by trapping the aneurysm, where 7/16 cases had preliminary EC-IC bypass. Of 16 trapping patients, six were trapped endovascularly and ten were trapped surgically. During the follow-up period (mean 33 months, range 6-96), total exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation was observed 100% of aneurysms in the trapping group and 84.6% in the FDD group (P = 0.192). Early postoperative morbidity was observed in three (23%) cases in the FDD group, and four (25%) in trapping group (P = 0.525). The FDD group had one (7.7%) fatal complication due to stent occlusion and severe ischemic stroke after three months postoperatively, despite appropriate antiplatelet therapy. There were no mortalities in the trapping group (P = 0.149). The rate of mRS 0-2 did not differ significantly across groups at discharge (81.3% vs. 69.2%; P = 0.667), and all patients had mRS 0-2 at follow-up (P = 1.000).
Conclusions: FDD deployment for giant paraclinoid aneurysms results in comparable angiographic and clinical outcomes to aneurysm trapping. Despite implementation of modern endovascular treatment methods, aneurysm trapping remains a valuable treatment option in carefully selected patients with giant paraclinoid aneurysms.
Keywords: EC-IC bypass; Flow diverter devices; Giant aneurysms; Internal carotid artery; Paraclinoid.
Similar articles
-
Extracranial-Intracranial High-Flow Bypass for Giant Ruptured Paraclinoid Aneurysm with Concomitant Bilateral Internal Carotid Artery Stenotic Dissection.World Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;117:265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.101. Epub 2018 Jun 21. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29936212
-
Flow diverter devices in ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience.J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;128(4):1037-1043. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161937. Epub 2017 Apr 7. J Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 28387623
-
Postprocedural, midterm, and long-term results of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverter devices: 7-year experience at a single center.Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1732. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28565988
-
Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass for Treatment of Blister Aneurysms: Efficacy and Analysis of Complications Compared with Alternative Treatment Strategies.World Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;117:e417-e424. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.046. Epub 2018 Jun 18. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29920386 Review.
-
The 25th anniversary of the retrograde suction decompression technique (Dallas technique) for the surgical management of paraclinoid aneurysms: historical background, systematic review, and pooled analysis of the literature.J Neurosurg. 2019 Mar 1;130(3):902-916. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.JNS17546. Epub 2018 May 4. J Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 29726776
Cited by
-
Microsurgical and endovascular treatment of un-ruptured cerebral aneurysms by European hybrid neurosurgeons to balance surgical skills and medical staff management.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1515-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04746-x. Epub 2021 Feb 10. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021. PMID: 33564907 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allen EV (1929) Thromboanginitis obliterans: methods of diagnosis of chronic occlusive arterial lesion distal to the wrist with illustrative cases. Am J Med Sci 178:237–244 - DOI
-
- Becske T, Potts MB, Shapiro M, Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, Moran CJ, Woo HH, Lopes DK, Berez AL, Cher DJ, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, Fiorella DJ, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M, Cekirge SH, Nelson PK (2017) Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg 127:81–88. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.6.JNS15311 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Drake CG, Vanderlinden RG, Amacher AL (1968) Carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms. J Neurosurg 29:24–31. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1968.29.1.0024 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Elhammady MS, Wolfe SQ, Farhat H, Ali Aziz-Sultan M, Heros RC (2010) Carotid artery sacrifice for unclippable and uncoilable aneurysms: endovascular occlusion vs common carotid artery ligation. Neurosurgery 67:1431–1436; discussion 1437. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f076ac - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fiorella D, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Kelly ME, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, Nelson PK (2009) Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 1:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis.2009.000083 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical