Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;81(8):2666-2672.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01817-1.

Selection history in context: Evidence for the role of reinforcement learning in biasing attention

Affiliations

Selection history in context: Evidence for the role of reinforcement learning in biasing attention

Brian A Anderson et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Attention is biased towards learned predictors of reward. The influence of reward history on attentional capture has been shown to be context-specific: When particular stimulus features are associated with reward, these features only capture attention when viewed in the context in which they were rewarded. Selection history can also bias attention, such that prior target features gain priority independently of reward history. The contextual specificity of this influence of selection history on attention has not been examined. In the present study, we demonstrate that the consequences of repetitive selection on attention robustly generalize across context, such that prior target features capture attention even in contexts in which they were never seen previously. Our findings suggest that the learning underlying attention driven by outcome-independent selection history differs qualitatively from the learning underlying value-driven attention, consistent with a distinction between associative and reinforcement learning mechanisms.

Keywords: Associative learning; Attentional capture; Contextual cuing; Selection history; Selective attention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Sequence and time course of trial events. (A) The target was defined as a red-or-green circle, and participants reported the identity of the line segment inside of the target (vertical or horizontal) with a key press. Each target color was only ever presented against one of the two background scenes (forest or city street). (B) During the test phase, the target was defined as the unique shape. On half of the trials, one of the non-target items—the distractor—was rendered in the color of a former target from training, presented equally-often on each background scene.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Behavioral data. (A) Response time by training session. (B) Accuracy by training session. (C) Response time by distractor condition in the test phase. Error bars reflect the within-subjects SEM. **p<0.005 ***p<0.001

References

    1. Anderson BA (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3):7, 1–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson BA (2015a). Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by spatial context. Visual Cognition, 23, 67–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson BA (2015b). Value-driven attentional priority is context specific. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 750–756. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson BA (2016). The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369, 24–39. - PubMed
    1. Anderson BA, & Britton MK (in press). On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli. Emotion. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources