Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme?
- PMID: 31309661
- DOI: 10.1111/codi.14762
Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme?
Abstract
Aim: Enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in elective colorectal surgery have been developed and implemented widely, but a subgroup of patients may still require longer hospital stays than expected. The aim of this study was to identify and describe factors compromising early postoperative recovery by asking 'why is the patient still in hospital today?' after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme.
Method: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection were evaluated postoperatively with predefined potential reasons for still being in hospital. The primary outcome was 'reason for still being in hospital' on postoperative day 0-4 and secondarily length of stay with a focus on differences between patients with and without a stoma.
Results: Ninety-six patients having colorectal cancer surgery were included. The median length of stay for the whole group was 3 days (range 1-14). The four dominant causes for patients without a stoma to be in hospital were lack of gastrointestinal function, lack of early mobilization, lack of normal micturition and nausea. Patients with a stoma stayed in hospital due to stoma training, lack of gastrointestinal function, lack of free micturition and a miscellaneous 'others' group.
Conclusion: Delayed gastrointestinal function, insufficient mobilization, poor urinary function and stoma care training have been characterized as dominant compromising factors for postoperative recovery. Together with a focus on frailty, future studies should focus on improving early mobilization, prevention and treatment of postoperative urinary retention and improved stoma care training, in order to minimize delay in postoperative recovery and discharge.
Keywords: ERAS; delayed postoperative recovery; ileus; laparoscopic colorectal surgery; length of stay.
Colorectal Disease © 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
References
-
- Kehlet H, Jørgensen CC. Advancing surgical outcomes research and quality improvement within an enhanced recovery program framework. Ann Surg 2016; 264: 237-8.
-
- Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 189-98.
-
- Sarin A, Litonius ES, Naidu R, Yost CS, Varma MG, Chen L-L. Successful implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program shortens length of stay and improves postoperative pain, and bowel and bladder function after colorectal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 2016; 16: 55.
-
- Xue L, Williamson A, Gaines S et al. An update on colorectal cancer. Curr Probl Surg 2018; 55: 76-116.
-
- Kehlet H. Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet 2008; 371: 791-3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical