Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 1;13(3):265-270.
doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190080.

Delayed ossification and abnormal development of tarsal bones in idiopathic clubfoot: should it affect bracing protocol when using the Ponseti method?

Affiliations

Delayed ossification and abnormal development of tarsal bones in idiopathic clubfoot: should it affect bracing protocol when using the Ponseti method?

Y Hemo et al. J Child Orthop. .

Abstract

Purpose: To point out the need to take into account the dysplastic nature of tarsal bones when treating idiopathic clubfoot (CF).

Methods: Review the published evidence on the developmental abnormalities of tarsal bones in idiopathic CF.

Results: The literature review provides abundant proof of the existence of delayed appearance and slower development of ossification centres of tarsal bones in idiopathic clubfoot.

Conclusion: Gentle manipulations and casting are the cornerstone of the Ponseti method. The biological response of all foot elements is critical for a successful outcome. Delayed ossification and abnormal development of tarsal bones in idiopathic CF may affect the results. Development of a personalized tailored bracing protocol based on severity assessment and response to casting treatment will improve results and quality of care in CF management.

Level of evidence: V.

Keywords: Ponseti; clubfoot; ossification; tarsal abnormalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Anteroposterior radiograph of both feet taken together of a three-year-old boy with a unilateral (R) clubfoot treated according to the Ponseti method. Note the size differences of the cuboid and the cuneiforms between the affected (R) and the non-affected (L) foot. The ossification centre of the affected tarsal navicular and intermediate cuneiform are not ossified yet.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Anteroposterior radiographs of both feet taken together of a three-year-old boy with a unilateral (L) clubfoot treated according to the Ponseti method. The navicular and intermediate cuneiform ossification centres are not seen yet.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Lateral standing radiographs of a six-year-old boy treated for left clubfoot according to the Ponseti method. Note that the ossification centre of tarsal navicular bone is just appearing in the affected foot (L).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Anteroposterior radiographs of both feet taken together of a three-year-old boy with a unilateral (L) clubfoot treated according to the Ponseti method. Note that all ossification centres of tarsal bones can be seen in the non-affected foot (R) but not in the affected foot (L). There is a size different between the tarsal bones of the affected and the non-affected bones.

References

    1. Pirani S, Zeznik L, Hodges D. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the congenital clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:719–726. - PubMed
    1. Hemo Y, Yavor A, Gigi R, Wientroub S. The significance of foot length at the initiation of the Ponseti method: a prospective study. J Child Orthop 2019;13:252–257. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dobbs MB, Rudzki JR, Purcell DB, et al. . Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:22–27. - PubMed
    1. Zionts LE, Ebramzadeh E, Morgan RD, Sangiorgio SN. Sixty years on: Ponseti method for clubfoot treatment produces high satisfaction despite inherent tendency to relapse. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2018;100:721–728. - PubMed
    1. Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. Congenital clubfoot: the results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1963;45-A:261–276.