Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 16;3(1):42.
doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0128-z.

Exploring content and psychometric validity of newly developed assessment tools for itch and skin pain in atopic dermatitis

Affiliations

Exploring content and psychometric validity of newly developed assessment tools for itch and skin pain in atopic dermatitis

Louise Newton et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin disorder characterized by chronic inflammation, altered skin barrier function, and inflammatory cell skin infiltration that decreases health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The study objective was to understand the patient perspective of AD burden and determine suitable patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.

Methods: This mixed methods study involved the collection of qualitative and quantitative information from adults (≥ 18 years old) and adolescents (12 - 17 years old) with clinician-confirmed AD regarding their experiences of AD symptoms and its impact on HRQoL. The first part of the study included three stages: in-person concept elicitation (CE) interviews, a 2-week daily electronic diary (eDiary) study, and in-person cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews. An Itch numeric rating scale (NRS) (v1.0) and a Skin Pain NRS (v1.0) evaluation during CD interviews required participants to think about their 'worst' itch and 'worst' skin pain in the past 24 h. Other PRO measures allowed for psychometric testing. The second part of the study involved telephone-depth interviews (TDIs) and qualitative feedback from participants who had not participated in the CD interviews. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Psychometric evaluation of NRS measures was performed using eDiary data.

Results: In the CE interviews, itch and/or itching and skin pain were the most prevalent symptoms consistently discussed by participants. Both NRS measures demonstrated strong psychometric reliability and were applicable across ages with suitable concurrent validity. During the CD interviews, some participants focused their answers on their 'average' itch/itching in the past 24 h, rather than their 'worst' itch. Some participants answered the Skin Pain NRS thinking about general pain or other types of pain, rather than skin pain specifically. Consequently, modifications to both measures addressed these issues and re-tested as paper-and-pen versions in subsequent TDIs. Itch NRS (v2.0) modifications helped participants focus on their worst itching. Most participants preferred Skin Pain NRS v2.0b, which included skin pain descriptors.

Conclusions: Itching and skin pain are the most important and relevant AD symptoms. The Itch NRS (v2.0) and Skin Pain NRS (v2.0b) appear to be appropriate endpoints for the assessment of itching and skin pain severity for clinical trials with adults and adolescents with AD.

Keywords: Adolescents; Adults; Atopic dermatitis; Clinical outcomes assessment; Health-related quality of life; Itch; Itch NRS; Patient-reported outcomes; Skin pain; Skin pain NRS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LN, PCGG, JNH, SH, TS, KWW, LFE, LAW, JIS — declare that they have no competing interests.

AMD, JCG, JP — are employed by the company funding this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study Flow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Item Distribution for the Itch NRS and Floor-Ceiling Effects of the Response Levels
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Item Distribution for the Skin Pain NRS and Floor-Ceiling Effects of the Response Levels

References

    1. Boguniewicz M, Leung DY. Atopic dermatitis: A disease of altered skin barrier and immune dysregulation. Immunological Reviews. 2011;242(1):233–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01027.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Okada H, et al. The ‘hygiene hypothesis’ for autoimmune and allergic diseases: An update. Clinical & Experimental Immunology. 2010;160(1):1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04139.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leung DY. New insights into atopic dermatitis: Role of skin barrier and immune dysregulation. Allergology International. 2013;62(2):151–161. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.13-RAI-0564. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis-Jones S. Quality of life and childhood atopic dermatitis: The misery of living with childhood eczema. International Journal of Clininal Practice. 2006;60(8):984–992. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01047.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lifschitz C. The impact of atopic dermatitis on quality of life. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2015;66(Suppl. 1):34–40. doi: 10.1159/000370226. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding