Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;48(5):1217-1240.
doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x.

Children's Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers

Affiliations

Children's Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers

Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak et al. J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

We explored the topic of irony comprehension by preschoolers. Two hundred and thirty-one children (77 four-year-olds, 89 five-year-olds, and 65 six-year-olds) were tested with the Irony Comprehension Task (ICT, Banasik and Bokus, in: Poster presented at the psycholinguistics conference in Flanders, Berg en Dal, 2012). Participants were asked questions checking comprehension of the intended meaning behind an ironic comment. Four conditions were used for the ironic utterances: targeted (ironic comment was a reference to the addressee's behavior), non-targeted (ironic comment was not a reference to the addressee's behavior), with symmetric dyads (a child said the ironic comment to another child), and asymmetric dyads (an adult said the ironic comment to a child). All groups achieved high irony comprehension scores. The results show a significant difference in accuracy between the 4-year-olds and the 6-year-olds only. The youngest group more accurately understood ironic utterances that referred to the addressee's action than those that did not, while older children did not show these differences. The aspect of who is speaking to whom was also significant only for the youngest children. These results provide important new insights into factors potentially influencing figurative language comprehension. Components such as participant structure and irony type require acknowledgement in the discussion on irony difficulty.

Keywords: Development of irony comprehension; Figurative language; Non-literal language; Pragmatic competence; Social reasoning; Verbal irony.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration accompanying the beginning of one of the story with ironic comment (targeted irony)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration accompanying the climax of one of the story with ironic comment when the (targeted irony)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Illustration accompanying the moment of ironic utterance said by a character in one of the story with ironic comment when the (targeted irony)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Illustration accompanying the beginning of one of the story with ironic comment (nontargeted irony)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Illustration accompanying the climax of one of the story with ironic comment when the (nontargeted irony)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Illustration accompanying the moment of ironic utterance said by a character in one of the story with ironic comment when the (targeted irony)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Illustration accompanying the beginning of one of the story with ironic comment (nontargeted irony, asymmetric dyad)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Illustration accompanying the climax of one of the story with ironic comment when the (nontargeted irony, asymmetric dyad)
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Illustration accompanying the moment of ironic utterance said by a character in one of the story with ironic comment when the (targeted irony, asymmetric dyad)
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Accuracy in the Irony Comprehension Task (ICT). Understanding of intended meanings in ironic utterances, average results, age

References

    1. Ackerman B. Young children’s understanding of a speaker’s intentional use of a false utterance. Developmental Psychology. 1981;17:472–480. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.4.472. - DOI
    1. Ackerman BP. On comprehending idioms: Do children get the picture? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1982;33:439–454. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(82)90058-3. - DOI
    1. Ackerman B. Form and function in children’s understanding of ironic utterances. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1983;35:487–508. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(83)90023-1. - DOI
    1. Aguert M, Le Vallois C, Martel K, Laval V. “That’s really clever!” Ironic hyperbole understanding in children. Journal of Child Language. 2017;45:1–13. - PubMed
    1. Akimoto Y, Miyazawa S, Muramoto T. Comprehension processes of verbal irony: The effects of salience, egocentric context, and allocentric theory of mind. Metaphor and Symbol. 2012;27:217–242. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2012.691750. - DOI