The comparative effectiveness of fourth-line drugs in resistant hypertension: An application in electronic health record data
- PMID: 31313390
- PMCID: PMC6771826
- DOI: 10.1002/pds.4808
The comparative effectiveness of fourth-line drugs in resistant hypertension: An application in electronic health record data
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the utility of electronic health records from a routine care setting in assessing comparative effectiveness of fourth-line anti-hypertensive drugs to treat resistant hypertension.
Methods: We conducted a cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink: a repository of electronic health records from UK primary care. We identified patients newly prescribed fourth-line anti-hypertensive drugs (aldosterone antagonist , beta-blocker, or alpha-blocker). Using propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, we compared the incidence of the primary outcome (composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction) between patients on different fourth-line drugs. AA was the reference drug in all comparisons. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, blood pressure changes, and heart failure. We used a negative control outcome, Herpes Zoster, to detect unmeasured confounding.
Results: Overall, 8639 patients were included. In propensity score-adjusted analyses, the hazard ratio for the primary outcome was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.55-1.19) for beta-blockers and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.46-0.96) for alpha-blockers versus AA. Findings for individual cardiovascular outcomes trended in a more plausible direction, albeit imprecise. A trend for a protective effect for Herpes Zoster across both comparisons was seen.
Conclusions: A higher rate of all-cause death in the AA group was likely due to unmeasured confounding in our analysis of the composite primary outcome, supported by our negative outcome analysis. Results for cardiovascular outcomes were plausible, but imprecise due to small cohort sizes and a low number of observed outcomes.
Keywords: anti-hypertensive drugs; comparative effectiveness; high blood pressure; hypertension; pharmacoepidemiology; resistant hypertension.
© 2019 The Authors Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L, Anderson HR, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet. 2015;386(10010):2287‐2323. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00128-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organisation (WHO) . A global brief on hypertension: silent killer, Global Public Health Crisis [Online]. Available from http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/publications/global_brief_hyp.... 2013.
-
- World Health Organisation (WHO) . Fact sheet: cardiovasular diseases. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/2017.
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management. NICE guidelines [CG127]2011. - PubMed
-
- Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, et al. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension. 2008;51(6):1403‐1419. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical