Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019:23:18-293.
doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-293. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

Legal Perspectives on Telemedicine Part 1: Legal and Regulatory Issues

Affiliations

Legal Perspectives on Telemedicine Part 1: Legal and Regulatory Issues

Christian D Becker et al. Perm J. 2019.

Abstract

Telemedicine is defined as the remote delivery of clinical care services through audio-visual conferencing technology. A shortage of care practitioners combined with an aging population with disproportionately increasing care utilization patterns has created a "perfect storm," which since the late 1990s has propelled telemedicine as a potential solution to bridge this supply/demand and access gap. In critical care approximately 20% of nonfederal adult intensive care unit (ICU) beds in the US today are supported by some form of tele-ICU coverage. The literature has shown with increasing clarity during the last decade that correct tele-ICU implementation improves outcomes and has the potential to significantly improve the financial performance of health care systems. As is often the case in technology-driven innovations, the legal and regulatory framework has been moving slower than the clinical adoption of this new care delivery model, which is true not just in critical care, but in other medical specialties as well. This 2-part series focuses on legal perspectives on telemedicine. The first part discusses legal and regulatory challenges of telemedicine in general, with a more in-depth focus on tele-ICU. The second part will discuss the effects of telemedicine implementation on medicolegal risk, using the litigious critical care environment as an example.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Statement

The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grundy BL, Jones PK, Lovitt A. Telemedicine in critical care: Problems in design, implementation, and assessment. Crit Care Med. 1982 Jul;10(7):471–5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198207000-00014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kahn JM, Cicero BD, Wallace DJ, Iwashyna TJ. Adoption of ICU telemedicine in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):362–8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a6419f. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lilly CM, Zubrow MT, Kempner KM, et al. Society of Critical Care Medicine Tele-ICU Committee. Critical care telemedicine: Evolution and state of the art. Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2429–36. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000539. . Erratum in Crit Care Med 2015 Feb;43(2):e64. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker C, Frishman WH, Scurlock C. Telemedicine and tele-ICU: The evolution and differentiation of a new medical field. Am J Med. 2016 Dec;129(12):e333–4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.05.045. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Sun D, Yang W, et al. Clinical and economic outcomes of telemedicine programs in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):383–93. doi: 10.1177/0885066617726942. - DOI - PubMed