Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 17;83(3):e00018-19.
doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00018-19. Print 2019 Aug 21.

Does Gender Bias Still Affect Women in Science?

Rachel L Roper  1
Affiliations
Review

Does Gender Bias Still Affect Women in Science?

Rachel L Roper. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. .

Abstract

The percentage of women employed in professional scientific positions has been low but is increasing over time. The U.S. National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have both implemented programs to improve women's participation in science, and many universities and companies have diversity and equity programs. While most faculty and scientists believe that they are fair and unbiased, numerous well-designed studies published in leading peer-reviewed journals show that gender bias in sciences and medicine is widespread and persistent today in both faculty and students. Recent studies show that gender bias affects student grading, professional hiring, mentoring, tenure, promotion, respect, grant proposal success, and pay. In addition, sexual harassment remains a significant barrier. Fortunately, several studies provide evidence that programs that raise conscious awareness of gender bias can improve equity in science, and there are a number of recommendations and strategies for improving the participation of women.

Keywords: STEM; bias; gender; medicine; science; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. National Science Board. 2018. Chapter 3: Science and engineering labor force In Science and engineering indicators 2018. National Science Board, Alexandria, VA: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/science-and.... Accessed 16 September 2018.
    1. Hechtman LA, Moore NP, Schulkey CE, Miklos AC, Calcagno AM, Aragon R, Greenberg JH. 2018. NIH funding longevity by gender. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:7943–7948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800615115. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WISE. 2018. Women in STEM workforce 2017. https://www.wisecampaign.org.uk/statistics/women-in-stem-workforce-2017/. Accessed 18 September 2018.
    1. Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. 2012. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:16474–16479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steinpreis R, Anders KA, Ritzke D. 1999. The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: a national empirical study. Sex Roles 41:509–528. doi: 10.1023/A:1018839203698. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources