Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 17:2019:5810540.
doi: 10.1155/2019/5810540. eCollection 2019.

Analysis of DICOM Image Compression Alternative Using Huffman Coding

Affiliations

Analysis of DICOM Image Compression Alternative Using Huffman Coding

Romi Fadillah Rahmat et al. J Healthc Eng. .

Abstract

Compression, in general, aims to reduce file size, with or without decreasing data quality of the original file. Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) is a medical imaging file standard used to store multiple information such as patient data, imaging procedures, and the image itself. With the rising usage of medical imaging in clinical diagnosis, there is a need for a fast and secure method to share large number of medical images between healthcare practitioners, and compression has always been an option. This work analyses the Huffman coding compression method, one of the lossless compression techniques, as an alternative method to compress a DICOM file in open PACS settings. The idea of the Huffman coding compression method is to provide codeword with less number of bits for the symbol that has a higher value of byte frequency distribution. Experiments using different type of DICOM images are conducted, and the analysis on the performances in terms of compression ratio and compression/decompression time, as well as security, is provided. The experimental results showed that the Huffman coding technique has the capability to compress the DICOM file up to 1 : 3.7010 ratio and up to 72.98% space savings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General architecture.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prefix tree for symbol with the same appearance frequency.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CT0011.dcm file hex content.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CT0011.HUF file hex content.
Figure 5
Figure 5
File size effect on duration of compression.
Figure 6
Figure 6
File size effect on duration of decompression.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Performance comparison with JPEG2000.

References

    1. Pianykh O. S. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM): A Practical Introduction and Survival Guide. 2nd. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2012.
    1. Piliouras T. C., Suss R. J., Yu P. L. Digital imaging & electronic health record systems: implementation and regulatory challenges faced by healthcare providers. Proceedings of the Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT 2015); May 2015; Farmingdale, NY, USA. IEEE; pp. 1–6.
    1. van Ooijen P. M. A., Aryanto K. Y., Broekema A., Horii S. DICOM data migration for PACS transition: procedure and pitfalls. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery. 2015;10(7):1055–1064. doi: 10.1007/s11548-014-1123-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yuan Y., Yan L., Wang Y., Hu G., Chen M. Sharing of larger medical DICOM imaging data-sets in cloud computing. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics. 2015;5(7):1390–1394. doi: 10.1166/jmihi.2015.1547. - DOI
    1. Salomon D., Motta G. Handbook of Data Compression. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources