Insurance coverage does not predict outcomes of genetic testing: The search for meaning in payer decisions for germline cancer tests
- PMID: 31317629
- PMCID: PMC6901727
- DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1155
Insurance coverage does not predict outcomes of genetic testing: The search for meaning in payer decisions for germline cancer tests
Abstract
In this work, we explore the results of germline cancer genetic tests in individuals whose insurance would not cover this testing. We enrolled 31 patients with a personal history of cancer whose health insurer denied coverage for a clinical germline cancer panel genetic test recommended by a medical genetics provider into a study providing exome sequencing and return of cancer-related results. Five participants (16%) had a pathogenic variant identified related to increased cancer risk. Three participants (10%) had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in a gene related to their cancer history. These rates are not significantly different than the 12% rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and VUS in 1,462 patients approved by insurance to have a similar clinical germline cancer test (p = .59 for P/LP variants; p = .87 for VUS; Shirts et al., Genet Med, 18:974, 2016). Health insurance guidelines may not meaningfully differentiate between patients with cancer who are likely to benefit from germline cancer genetic testing and those who will not. Failure to identify pathogenic variants in this research cohort would have led to suboptimal care. Strategic evaluation of current germline cancer genetic testing coverage policies is needed to appropriately deliver precision medicine.
Keywords: cancer genetics; clinical genetics; genetic counseling; genetics; germline genetic testing; health insurer coverage; hereditary cancer; insurer guidelines.
© 2019 National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
Laura M Amendola, M. Ragan Hart, Robin L Bennett, Martha Horike-Pyne, Michael Dorschner, Brian Shirts and Gail P Jarvik declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Amendola LM, Berg JS, Horowitz CR, Angelo F, Bensen JT, Biesecker BB, . . . Jarvik GP (2018). The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 103(3), 319–327. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Berg JS, Amendola LM, Eng C, Van Allen E, Gray SW, Wagle N, . . . Jarvik GP (2013). Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Genetics in Medicine, 15(11), 860–867. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
