Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1988;94(4):437-51.
doi: 10.1007/BF00212836.

Caffeine physical dependence: a review of human and laboratory animal studies

Affiliations
Review

Caffeine physical dependence: a review of human and laboratory animal studies

R R Griffiths et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988.

Abstract

Although caffeine is the most widely used behaviorally active drug in the world, caffeine physical dependence has been poorly characterized in laboratory animals and only moderately well characterized in humans. In humans, a review of 37 clinical reports and experimental studies dating back to 1833 shows that headache and fatigue are the most frequent withdrawal symptoms, with a wide variety of other signs and symptoms occurring at lower frequency (e.g. anxiety, impaired psychomotor performance, nausea/vomiting and craving). When caffeine withdrawal occurs, severity can vary from mild to extreme (i.e. incapacitating). The withdrawal syndrome has an onset at 12-24 h, peak at 20-48 h, and duration of about 1 week. The pharmacological specificity of caffeine withdrawal has been established. The proportion of heavy caffeine users who will experience withdrawal symptoms has been estimated from experimental studies to range from 25% to 100%. Withdrawal symptoms have been documented after relatively short-term exposure to high doses of caffeine (i.e. 6-15 days of greater than or equal to 600 mg/day). Although animal and human studies suggest that physical dependence may potentiate the reinforcing effects of caffeine, human studies also demonstrate that a history of substantial caffeine intake is not a necessary condition for caffeine to function as a reinforcer. The similarities and differences between caffeine and classic drugs of abuse are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Life Sci. 1985 Jun 17;36(24):2347-58 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1965 Jul;149:156-9 - PubMed
    1. Can Med Assoc J. 1968 Mar 30;98(13):619-26 - PubMed
    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1978 Aug;135(8):963-6 - PubMed
    1. Cephalalgia. 1987 Mar;7(1):15-9 - PubMed

Publication types