The Scope of Midwifery Practice Regulations and the Availability of the Certified Nurse-Midwifery and Certified Midwifery Workforce, 2012-2016
- PMID: 31318150
- DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13007
The Scope of Midwifery Practice Regulations and the Availability of the Certified Nurse-Midwifery and Certified Midwifery Workforce, 2012-2016
Abstract
Introduction: Studies have linked midwifery practice laws to the availability of midwives but have generally not related workforce data to potential demand for reproductive health services. We examined state regulatory structure for midwives and its relationship to midwifery distribution and vital statistics data at the state and county level.
Methods: Midwifery distribution data came from the Area Health Resources Files, distribution of women of reproductive age came from the US Census, and birth statistics came from US Natality Files from 2012 to 2016. Midwifery regulations were drawn from American College of Nurse-Midwives Annual Reports. We used bivariate analysis to examine the relationship between state midwifery practice regulations and the number of midwives available in states and counties to potentially meet women's health care needs.
Results: Twenty states and the District of Columbia had autonomous practice regulatory frameworks, whereas 24 states had collaborative practice regulatory frameworks during the years between 2012 and 2016. Six states changed regulations during that period. In 2016, the number of midwife-attended births per number of midwives in a state was not related to the regulatory framework. However, states with autonomous frameworks had 2.2 times as many midwives per women of reproductive age (P < .0001) and 2.3 times as many midwives per total births when compared with states with collaborative statutory frameworks (P < .0001). At the county level, 70.1% of US counties had no midwife. Of those states with autonomous practice, only 59.7% of counties had no midwives, compared with 74.1% in states with collaborative models (P < .0001).
Discussion: Midwives have the potential to help address the shortage of maternity and reproductive health service providers. Our research suggests that increasing the number of states with autonomous regulatory frameworks can be one way to expand access to care for women in the United States.
Keywords: access to care; access to maternity and reproductive health services; certified midwives; certified nurse-midwives; health policy; maternal health; midwife-attended births; midwifery; midwifery practice laws; midwifery workforce; public health.
© 2019 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
Similar articles
-
State Scope of Practice Laws, Nurse-Midwifery Workforce, and Childbirth Procedures and Outcomes.Womens Health Issues. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 7. Womens Health Issues. 2016. PMID: 26965196
-
Regulation of Certified Nurse-Midwife Scope of Practice: Change in the Professional Practice Index, 2000 to 2015.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;60(5):510-8. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12362. Epub 2015 Sep 18. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 26382028
-
The Practice of Midwifery in Rural US Hospitals.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Jul;61(4):411-8. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12474. Epub 2016 Apr 14. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016. PMID: 27077363
-
Regulation of Prescriptive Authority for Certified Nurse-Midwives and Certified Midwives: 2015 National Overview.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;60(5):519-33. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12368. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 26461190 Review.
-
United States Model Midwifery Legislation and Regulation: Development of a Consensus Document.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Nov;63(6):652-659. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12727. Epub 2018 Feb 20. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018. PMID: 29461681 Review.
Cited by
-
Counting Midwives Providing Clinical Care in Nevada.Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 Jul;40(4):1002-1006. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3921. Epub 2025 Mar 6. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025. PMID: 40050242 Free PMC article.
-
Low birthweight rate differences associated with distinct perinatal staffing mixes at federally funded health centers.Health Aff Sch. 2024 Dec 4;2(12):qxae113. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae113. eCollection 2024 Dec. Health Aff Sch. 2024. PMID: 39664479 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a method to identify midwives in national provider identifier data.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06122-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37993806 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67(8):1-50.
-
- Goodman S. Piercing the veil: the marginalization of midwives in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(3):610-621.
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67(1):1-54.
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017;66(1):1.
-
- Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(12):1-64.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources