Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov;198(2):153-169.
doi: 10.1111/cei.13352. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

Formulation technologies for oral vaccines

Affiliations
Review

Formulation technologies for oral vaccines

R R C New. Clin Exp Immunol. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Many options now exist for constructing oral vaccines which, in experimental systems, have shown themselves to be able to generate highly effective immunity against infectious diseases. Their suitability for implementation in clinical practice, however, for prevention of outbreaks, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), is not always guaranteed, because of factors such as cost, logistics and cultural and environmental conditions. This brief overview provides a summary of the various approaches which can be adopted, and evaluates them from a pharmaceutical point, taking into account potential regulatory issues, expense, manufacturing complexity, etc., all of which can determine whether a vaccine approach will be successful in the late stages of development. Attention is also drawn to problems arising from inadequate diet, which impacts upon success in stimulating effective immunity, and identifies the use of lipid-based carriers as a way to counteract the problem of nutritional deficiencies in vaccination campaigns.

Keywords: Peyer’s patch; delivery; oral; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Routes of oral vaccine‐delivered antigens through the intestine, accessing different parts of the immune system of the body. (1) Via microcapillaries into the local and peripheral blood circulation; (2) via the lamina propria and intestinal lymphatics into the mesenteric lymph nodes; (3) direct uptake though M cells into the Peyer’s patches.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Different types of particulate carrier employed as oral vaccine vehicles. (1) Membrane vesicles (liposomes); (2) polymeric micro/nanoparticles; (3) oil droplets and emulsions.

References

    1. Lin IYC, Van TTH, Smooker PM. Live‐attenuated bacterial vectors: tools for vaccine and therapeutic agent delivery. Vaccines 2015; 3:940–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pandit J, Sultana Y, Kalam MA. Newer technologies in oral vaccine delivery. Current Drug Therapy 2014; 9:173–87.
    1. Kim SH, Jang YS. The development of mucosal vaccines for both mucosal and systemic immune induction and the roles played by adjuvants. Clin Exp Vaccine Res 2017; 6:15–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belyakov IM, Ahlers JD. What role does the route of immunization play in the generation of protective immunity against mucosal pathogens? J Immunol 2009; 183:6883–92. - PubMed
    1. Mowat AM. Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens. Nat Rev Immunol 2003; 3:331–41. - PubMed