Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 20:2019:2651037.
doi: 10.1155/2019/2651037. eCollection 2019.

Weiqi Decoction Attenuated Chronic Atrophic Gastritis with Precancerous Lesion through Regulating Microcirculation Disturbance and HIF-1 α Signaling Pathway

Affiliations

Weiqi Decoction Attenuated Chronic Atrophic Gastritis with Precancerous Lesion through Regulating Microcirculation Disturbance and HIF-1 α Signaling Pathway

Jing Yin et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. .

Abstract

Aim: Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG), the precancerous lesions of gastric cancer, plays an important role in the stepwise process of gastric cancer. The ancient Chinese medicine believes in that Qi deficiency and blood stasis are involved in the pathogenesis of CAG. Weiqi decoction, a classical formula from Longhua Hospital, could supplement Qi and activate blood circulation of human beings and has been used for treating CAG in clinic over twenty years. The study aims to clarify the effect and underlying molecular mechanism of Weiqi decoction on CAG rats.

Methods: Forty-eight male Wistar rats were divided randomly into six groups: control group, model group, folic acid group, and WQD-treated groups at doses of 4 g/kg, 2 g/kg, and 1 g/kg, with eight rats in each group. MNNG and saturated NaCl were used to induce CAG rat with precancerous lesion (intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia). After 40 weeks, gastric mucosal blood flow was measured using Laser Doppler Flowmetry. The pathological changes of the gastric mucosa were identified by H&E staining and AB-PAS staining. The protein expression of COX-2, HIF-1α, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, Ki67, and cleaved caspase 3 in the gastric tissues was measured by western blotting approach. Gene expression of COX-2, HIF-1α, VEGF, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, Ang-1, and Ang-2 was detected by using Quantitative PCR method. The PGE2 concentrations in serum were detected by ELISA method. The protein expression of Ki67 in gastric mucosa was also detected by immunohistochemistry.

Results: Compared with control rats, atrophy and intestinal metaplasia as well as the microcirculation disturbance of gastric mucosa were induced in the stomach of CAG rats identified by the H&E and AB-PAS staining as well as microcirculation measurement, which could be significantly attenuated by WQD treatment. Moreover, compared with the control group, the protein and gene expression of COX-2, HIF-1α, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 in gastric tissues of pylorus was obviously increased and the serum PGE2 level was significantly deceased in CAG rats, which could be significantly counteracted by WQD administration. However, the gene expression of Ang-1 and Ang-2 was not significant difference between control rats and CAG rats, and WQD also had no significant effect on the gene expression of Ang-1 and Ang-2. Furthermore, the increased cell proliferation marked by upregulated protein expression of Ki67 and decreased cell apoptosis marked by downregulated protein expression of cleaved caspase 3 in stomach of pylorus in CAG rats were obviously reversed by WQD treatment.

Conclusion: WQD attenuated CAG with precancerous lesion through regulating gastric mucosal blood flow disturbance and HIF-1α signaling pathway.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of WQD on gastric mucosal microcirculation in stomach of CAG rats. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n=6-8/group). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA assay. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 vs model group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The representative pathology of gastric tissues in each group (H&E staining, 100× magnifications). (a) Folic acid group, (b) control group, (c) model group, (d) WQD 4 g/kg group, (e) WQD 2 g/kg group, and (f) WQD 1 g/kg group. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n=6-8/group). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA assay. ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 vs model group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The representative pathology of gastric tissues in each group (AB-PAS staining, 100× magnifications). Gastric intestinal metaplasia changes were stained with purple and blue color. (a) Folic acid group, (b) control group, (c) model group, (d) WQD 4 g/kg group, (e) WQD 2 g/kg group, and (f) WQD 1g/kg group. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n=6-8/group). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA assay. p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 vs model group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of WQD on the serum PGE2 levels in model rats. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n=6-8/group). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA assay. ∗∗p < 0.01 vs model group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of WQD on the gene expressions of COX-2, HIF-1α, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, Ang-1, and Ang-2 in the gastric tissue. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n=6-8/group). Data were analyzed by one-way-ANOVA assay. p < 0.05. ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs model group.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effects of WQD on the relative protein expressions of COX-2, HIF-1α, VEGF and, VEGFR1 in the gastric tissue. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n=6-8/group). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA assay. p < 0.05. ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 vs model group.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effects of WQD on the protein expressions of Ki67 and Cleaved caspase 3 in the pylorus of CAG rats with precancerous lesion. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n=6-8/group). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA assay. p < 0.05. ∗∗ p < 0.01 vs model group.
Figure 8
Figure 8
WQD treatment decreased protein expression of Ki67 detected by IHC staining in pylorus of CAG rats with precancerous lesion (100× magnifications). (a) Folic acid group, (b) Control group, (c) model group, (d) WQD 4 g/kg group, (e) WQD 2 g/kg group, and (f) WQD 1 g/kg group. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n=6-8/group). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA assay. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.001 vs model group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hamashima C. Current issues and future perspectives of gastric cancer screening. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014;20(38):13767–13774. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13767. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karimi P., Islami F., Anandasabapathy S., Freedman N. D., Kamangar F. Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2014;23(5):700–713. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-1057. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adamu M. A., Weck M. N., Gao L., Brenner H. Incidence of chronic atrophic gastritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of follow-up studies. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2010;25(7):439–448. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9482-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malfertheiner P., Megraud F., O'Morain C. A., et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—the Maastricht IV/ Florence consensus report. Gut. 2012;61(5):646–664. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302084. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graham D. Y., Dore M. P. Helicobacter pylori therapy: a paradigm shift. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2016;14(6):577–585. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2016.1178065. - DOI - PMC - PubMed