Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Dec;15(6):371-376.
doi: 10.1111/ajco.13220. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-arc therapy versus sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy in postoperative treatment for primary soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-arc therapy versus sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy in postoperative treatment for primary soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh

Irene Ortiz González et al. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has demonstrated improved local control in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after limb-sparing surgery compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Our purpose was to evaluate sliding-window IMRT (SW-IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) in planning target volume (PTV) coverage and dose to organs-at-risk (OAR).

Methods: Sixteen patients undergoing postoperative RT for lower extremity STS were included. For each patient, one VMAT plan and one SW-IMRT plan were proposed. Both were evaluated using cumulative dose-volume histogram data for OAR and PTVs. Prescribed dose was 66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to PTV1 and 56 Gy (1.69 Gy/fraction) to PTV2. OARs contoured were femur, neurovascular bundle, minimum tissue corridor, normal tissue outside PTV2, joint and genitalia. T-Student test was performed.

Results: Eleven male (69%) and five female patients (31%) were analyzed. Mean age was 60 years. Both techniques showed optimal target coverage, conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). VMAT PTV2 CI was 1.13 (mean) ± 0.08 (standard deviation) versus 1.19 ± 0.10 SW-IMRT PTV2 CI (P < 0.05). VMAT PTV1 HI was 0.09 ± 0.01 versus 0.08 ± 0.01 SW-IMRT PTV1 HI (P < 0.05). Regarding OARs, VMAT delivered lower dose to femur, genitalia, normal tissue outside PTV2 and joints. SW-IMRT spared tissue corridor mean dose (10.4 Gy ± 6.8 Gy) versus (14.7 ± 6.5 Gy) VMAT (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Both techniques achieved great conformity, homogeneity and coverage of PTV. VMAT produced lower dose to OARS and SW-IMRT was superior in sparing dose to normal-tissue-corridor, which could reduce risk of lymphedema.

Keywords: IMRT; VMAT; lower extremity; postoperative radiotherapy; soft tissue sarcoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Yang JC, Chang AE, Baker AR, et al. Randomized prospective study of the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:197-103.
    1. Suit HD, Russell WO, Martin RG. Management of patients with sarcoma of soft tissue in an extremity. Cancer. 1973;31:1247-1255.
    1. Rosenberg SA, Tepper J, Glatstein E, et al. The treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Ann Surg. 1982;196:305-315.
    1. Potter DA, Kinsella T, Glatstein E, et al. High-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Cancer. 1986;58:190-105.
    1. Alektiar KM, Brennan MF, Singer S. Local control comparison of adjuvant brachytherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy in primary high-grade sarcoma of the extremity. Cancer. 2011;117:3229-3234.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources