Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Sep;13(9):1827-1835.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12547. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

Impact of circulating tumor DNA mutant allele fraction on prognosis in RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Impact of circulating tumor DNA mutant allele fraction on prognosis in RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Elena Elez et al. Mol Oncol. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Despite major advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the survival rate remains very poor. This study aims at exploring the prognostic value of RAS-mutant allele fraction (MAF) in plasma in mCRC. Forty-seven plasma samples from 37 RAS-mutated patients with nonresectable metastases were tested for RAS in circulating tumor DNA using BEAMing before first- and/or second-line treatment. RAS MAF was correlated with several clinical parameters (number of metastatic sites, hepatic volume, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 levels, primary site location, and treatment line) and clinical outcome [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. An independent cohort of 32 patients from the CAPRI-GOIM trial was assessed for clinical outcome based on plasma baseline MAF. RAS MAF analysis at baseline revealed a significant correlation with longer OS [Hazard ratios (HR) = 3.514; P = 0.00066]. Patients with lower MAF also showed a tendency to longer PFS, although not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed RAS MAFs as an independent prognostic factor in both OS (HR = 2.73; P = 0.006) and first-line PFS (HR = 3.74; P = 0.049). Tumor response to treatment in patients with higher MAF was progression disease (P = 0.007). Patients with low MAFs at baseline in the CAPRI-GOIM group also showed better OS [HR = 3.84; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.5-9.6; P = 0.004] and better PFS (HR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.07-5.62; P = 0.033). This minimally invasive test may help in adding an independent factor to better estimate outcomes before initiating treatment. Further prospective studies using MAF as a stratification factor could further validate its utility in clinical practice.

Keywords: MAF; RAS analysis; circulating tumor DNA; metastatic colorectal cancer; prognostic biomarker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JT has served in a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, ImClone, Lilly, Merck, S.L., Madrid, Merck Serono, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Taiho. RS has served in a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Merck, S.L., Madrid, and Roche Dx and obtained research funding from Roche Dx. AV has served in a consulting or advisory role for Merck, S.L., Madrid, Merck Serono, and Sysmex. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MAF distribution. Representation of MAF (%) distributions according to: (A) the two lines of treatment; (B) tumor laterality; (C) number of metastatic lesions; and (D) metastatic site. Box plots show the interquartile range (IQR) with median, 25th and 75th percentile, outliers, and P‐values. Continued lines (in graph D) indicate the comparison between two variables. Statistically significant P‐values are marked with a (*). Samples are represented by light blue dots.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PFS and OS analyses in first‐line treatment. Survival curves are shown for samples with MAF < 5.8% (black line) and MAF> 5.8% (red line) in terms of PFS (A) and OS (B) in the 1st line. HR and P‐values are shown. (C) MAF distribution according to best response to treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PFS and OS analyses in the validation cohort (CAPRI‐GOIM trial). Survival curves are shown for samples with MAF < 5.8% (black line) and MAF > 5.8% (red line) in terms of PFS (A) and OS (B). HR and P‐values are shown.

References

    1. Arnold D, Lueza B, Douillard JY, Peeters M, Lenz HJ, Venook A, Heinemann V, Van Cutsem E, Pignon JP, Tabernero J et al (2017) Prognostic and predictive value of primary tumour side in patients with RAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and EGFR directed antibodies in six randomized trials. Ann Oncol 28, 1713–1729. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azuara D, Santos C, Lopez‐Doriga A, Grasselli J, Nadal M, Sanjuan X, Marin F, Vidal J, Montal R, Moreno V et al (2016) Nanofluidic digital PCR and extended genotyping of RAS and BRAF for improved selection of metastatic colorectal cancer patients for Anti‐EGFR therapies. Mol Cancer Ther 15, 1106–1112. - PubMed
    1. Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ, Kinde I, Wang Y, Agrawal N, Bartlett BR, Wang H, Luber B, Alani RM et al (2014) Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early‐ and late‐stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med 6, 224ra24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ciardiello F, Normanno N, Maiello E, Martinelli E, Troiani T, Pisconti S, Giuliani F, Barone C, Cartenì G, Rachiglio AM et al (2014) Clinical activity of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab according to extended gene mutation status by next‐generation sequencing: findings from the CAPRI‐GOIM trial. Ann Oncol 25, 1756–1761. - PubMed
    1. Contal C and O'Quigley J (1999) An application of changepoint methods in studying the effect of age on survival in breast cancer. Comput Stat Data Anal 30, 253–270.

Publication types

Substances