Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;54(6):875-893.
doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12494. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

Use of diverse diagnostic criteria for acquired apraxia of speech: a scoping review

Jessica Molloy  1   2 , Caroline Jagoe  1
Affiliations

Use of diverse diagnostic criteria for acquired apraxia of speech: a scoping review

Jessica Molloy et al. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Background: There is a growing body of evidence that speech and language therapy (SLT) intervention is effective in improving communication ability for individuals with non-progressive acquired apraxia of speech (AOS). However, there is no universally agreed diagnostic standard for AOS, and diverging opinions on its diagnostic features. This has led to claims that diverse diagnostic criteria may be used to select participants for AOS research studies. These claims raise concerns for evidence-based practice in AOS but have yet to be systematically investigated.

Aims: To determine the presence, nature and extent of diversity in the diagnostic criteria for non-progressive AOS used in both published studies and clinical practice internationally.

Methods & procedures: The study used a scoping review methodology that followed the 2005 framework of Arksey and O'Malley and included a consultation exercise in the form of an online survey of international SLTs. The scoping review included 157 studies involving participants with acquired AOS, published between 1997 and 2017. There were 264 respondents to the online survey of SLTs, with a completion rate of 72%. Respondents came from 15 countries and had varying levels of clinical experience.

Main contribution: This study found that no common set of diagnostic criteria for AOS was used universally across research and practice. Although the diagnostic criteria used to select participants with AOS were reported explicitly in most studies, they varied from study to study. Some studies used directly conflicting criteria. Use of specific diagnostic criteria in studies was influenced by year of publication but not by location. There was a trend towards increasing consistency in diagnostic criteria in recent years. Compared with the research, the survey revealed relatively greater consistency among SLTs on the speech features considered indicative of AOS, although the SLTs who responded to the survey showed variation in how diagnostic criteria were combined into sets. Use of specific diagnostic criteria was not associated with SLTs' location or experience. There were differences between the diagnostic criteria for AOS used most commonly in research studies and those selected most commonly by SLTs in the survey. These findings have implications for the generalizability of AOS research to clinical practice, as well as implications for effective research synthesis.

Conclusions & implications: The claim that research and practice in the field of AOS is characterized by the use of diverse diagnostic criteria is supported by this scoping review. The findings support the need to develop a universal consensus standard for AOS diagnosis to ensure consistency across research and clinical practice.

Keywords: acquired apraxia of speech; diagnostic criteria; variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arksey, H. and O'Malley, L., 2005, Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19-32.
    1. Aldenderfer, M. S. and Blashfeld, R. K., 1984, Cluster Analysis. (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).
    1. Bailey, D. J., Blomgren, M., Delong, C., Berggren, K. and Wambaugh, J. L., 2017, Quantification and systematic characterization of stuttering-like disfluencies in acquired apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2S), 641-648.
    1. Bailey, D. J., Eatchel, K. and Wambaugh, J. L., 2015, Sound production treatment: synthesis and quantification of outcomes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(2), S798-S814.
    1. Ball, L. J., 1999, Communication Characteristics of Children with Developmental Apraxia of Speech (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources