Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jul 19;9(1):10509.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46718-3.

Pan-Renal Cell Carcinoma classification and survival prediction from histopathology images using deep learning

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pan-Renal Cell Carcinoma classification and survival prediction from histopathology images using deep learning

Sairam Tabibu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Histopathological images contain morphological markers of disease progression that have diagnostic and predictive values. In this study, we demonstrate how deep learning framework can be used for an automatic classification of Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) subtypes, and for identification of features that predict survival outcome from digital histopathological images. Convolutional neural networks (CNN's) trained on whole-slide images distinguish clear cell and chromophobe RCC from normal tissue with a classification accuracy of 93.39% and 87.34%, respectively. Further, a CNN trained to distinguish clear cell, chromophobe and papillary RCC achieves a classification accuracy of 94.07%. Here, we introduced a novel support vector machine-based method that helped to break the multi-class classification task into multiple binary classification tasks which not only improved the performance of the model but also helped to deal with data imbalance. Finally, we extracted the morphological features from high probability tumor regions identified by the CNN to predict patient survival outcome of most common clear cell RCC. The generated risk index based on both tumor shape and nuclei features are significantly associated with patient survival outcome. These results highlight that deep learning can play a role in both cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cancer Classification Pipeline. (1) Kidney Whole slide images. (2) 512*512 patches extracted from images with 50% overlap and background removed using pixel thresholding. (3) Patches from normal and cancerous slides fed to the deep network. (4) Patches classified as cancerous or non-cancerous. (5) High probability patches identified by the trained network and binary mask is applied. (6) The patches from three subtypes used to train a similar deep architecture for a three-way classification. (7) Features extracted from the penultimate layer of the network and fed to DAG-SVM and a three-way classification is performed by it.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Directed Acyclic Graph SVM (DAG-SVM)-Architecture of the model for a four-class problem where features learned by the deep network are used to train all the classifiers. Each node is a binary classifier for a pair of classes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Shape Features Extraction Pipeline. (A) Tissue slide image. (B) Heatmap generated after each patch is fed through the deep network. (C) High probability patches are highlighted. (i) Binary mask generated for high probability patches. (ii) Small patches removed using morphological operations. (iii) Tumor shape features extracted from final image. (a) High probability patches accumulated. (b) Nuclei segmented from each patch. (c) Nuclei shape features extracted from each patch.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Tumor shape and cell shape features predict survival outcome of KIRC patients.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Visualization of cancerous and normal tissue regions at 40x resolution.

References

    1. American cancer society, http://www.cancer.org/cancer/kidneycancer. Accessed: 2018-10-1.
    1. Znaor A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Laversanne M, Jemal A, Bray F. International variations and trends in renal cell carcinoma incidence and mortality. Eur. urology. 2015;67:519–530. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kovacs G, et al. The heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours. The J. Pathol. A J. Pathol. Soc. Gt. Br. Irel. 1997;183:131–133. - PubMed
    1. Truong LD, Shen SS. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of renal neoplasms. Arch. pathology & laboratory medicine. 2011;135:92–109. - PubMed
    1. Chen F, et al. Multilevel genomics-based taxonomy of renal cell carcinoma. Cell reports. 2016;14:2476–2489. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms