Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jul 19;9(1):10516.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47014-w.

Cimp-Positive Status is More Representative in Multiple Colorectal Cancers than in Unique Primary Colorectal Cancers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cimp-Positive Status is More Representative in Multiple Colorectal Cancers than in Unique Primary Colorectal Cancers

Sandra Tapial et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) with CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) is recognized as a subgroup of CRC that shows association with particular genetic defects and patient outcomes. We analyzed CIMP status of 229 individuals with CRC using an eight-marker panel (CACNA1G, CDKN2A, CRABP1, IGF2, MLH1, NEUROG1, RUNX3 and SOCS1); CIMP-(+) tumors were defined as having ≥ 5 methylated markers. Patients were divided into individuals who developed a "unique" CRC, which were subclassified into early-onset CRC (EOCRC) and late-onset CRC (LOCRC), and patients with multiple primary CRCs subclassified into synchronous CRC (SCRC) and metachronous CRC (MCRC). We found 9 (15.2%) CIMP-(+) EOCRC patients related with the proximal colon (p = 0.008), and 19 (26.8%) CIMP-(+) LOCRC patients associated with tumor differentiation (p = 0.045), MSI status (p = 0.021) and BRAF mutation (p = 0.001). Thirty-five (64.8%) SCRC patients had at least one CIMP-(+) tumor and 20 (44.4%) MCRC patients presented their first tumor as CIMP-(+). Thirty-nine (72.2%) SCRC patients showed concordant CIMP status in their simultaneous tumors. The differences in CIMP-(+) frequency between groups may reflect the importance of taking into account several criteria for the development of multiple primary neoplasms. Additionally, the concordance between synchronous tumors suggests CIMP status is generally maintained in SCRC patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample showing Microsatellite stability (above) and other showing Microsatellite instability (below).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sample with wild-type KRAS (above), other sample with codon 13 mutation (medium), and the last with codon 12 mutation (below), seen in the Integrative Genomics Viewer by Next Generation Sequencing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Sample with CpG Island Methylator Phenotype negative (CIMP−). (B) Sample with CpG Island Methylator Phenotype positive (CIMP+).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of methylated genes in each tumor of (a) EOCRC patients; (b) LOCRC patients; (c) SCRC patients; (d) MCRC patients.

References

    1. Siegel RL, et al. Colorectal Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:177–193. - PubMed
    1. Network TCGA, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487:330–337. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsai M-H, et al. DNA Hypermethylation of SHISA3 in Colorectal Cancer: An Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015;22:1481–1489. - PubMed
    1. Duffy MJ, O’Donovan N, Crown J. Use of molecular markers for predicting therapy response in cancer patients. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2011;37:151–159. - PubMed
    1. Dienstmann R, et al. Consensus molecular subtypes and the evolution of precision medicine in colorectal cancer. Nat. Rev. 2017;17:79. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances