Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;140(1):174-181.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.06.138. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

Variation in Cutaneous Patterns of Melanomagenesis According to Germline CDKN2A/CDK4 Status in Melanoma-Prone Families

Affiliations

Variation in Cutaneous Patterns of Melanomagenesis According to Germline CDKN2A/CDK4 Status in Melanoma-Prone Families

Michael R Sargen et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

CDKN2A and CDK4 are well-established melanoma susceptibility genes, but their effect on tumor location and distribution is unknown. We used a case-case study design to assess for differences in tumor location between mutation carriers (CDKN2A = 141 patients, 348 melanomas; CDK4 = 15 patients, 54 melanomas) and noncarriers (104 patients, 157 melanomas) in US melanoma-prone families. Associations between groups were assessed with chi-square tests. Odds ratios (ORs) for tumor location were adjusted for diagnosis age, gender, and superficial spreading subtype. Models included random effects to account for within individual and family correlations. Compared with having a truncal melanoma, CDK4 (vs. noncarriers: lower extremities OR = 14.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.02-42.0, P < 0.001; upper extremities OR = 6.88, 95% CI = 2.37-19.9, P < 0.001; head and neck OR = 18.6, 95% CI = 4.04-85.2, P < 0.001) and CDKN2A (vs. noncarriers: lower extremities OR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.56-5.82, P < 0.05; upper extremities OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.03-3.52, P < 0.05; head and neck OR = 5.40, 95% CI = 2.10-13.9, P < 0.001) carriers had higher odds of developing melanoma at all other sites. Similar findings were observed for analyses stratified by gender, age, and first versus subsequent melanoma diagnoses. Further studies are needed to understand the biology underlying these genotype-associated patterns of tumor development, which could provide new insights into melanoma treatment and prevention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00040352.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest, financial or other, related to the contents of this article.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Cutaneous patterns of melanomagenesis in U.S. melanoma-prone families with and without germline CDKN2A and CDK4 mutations.
The above figure illustrates the regional distribution (column “a”) and specific biopsy sites (column “b”) for melanomas diagnosed in individuals from U.S. melanoma-prone families according to genotype. Global p-values comparing differences in melanoma distribution between mutation carriers (CDKN2A or CDK4) and non-carriers (individuals without a CDKN2A or CDK4 mutation) with adjustments for within individual and within family correlations, age at diagnosis, gender, and superficial spreading melanoma subtype are provided in column “a”.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Body surface area and melanoma distribution.
The above figure illustrates the observed and expected number of melanomas for each anatomic region according to genotype. In column “a”, the total number of melanomas (N) for each group (non-carriers, CDKN2A carriers, CDK4 carriers) was multiplied by the body surface area of each anatomic region to calculate the expected number of melanomas. Differences between the observed and expected melanoma distribution were assessed by chi-square test (column “a”). The ratio of observed to expected number of melanomas for each anatomic region is presented in column “b”.

References

    1. Aspinwall LG, Taber JM, Kohlmann W, Leaf SL, Leachman SA. Unaffected family members report improvements in daily routine sun protection 2 years following melanoma genetic testing. Genet Med 2014;16(11):846–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop DT, Demenais F, Goldstein AM, Bergman W, Bishop JN, Bressac-de Paillerets B, et al. Geographical variation in the penetrance of CDKN2A mutations for melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94(12):894–903. - PubMed
    1. Floreil SR, Boucher KM, Garibotti G, Astle J, Kerber R, Mineau G, et al. Population-based analysis of prognostic factors and survival in familial melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(28):7168–77. - PubMed
    1. Goldstein AM, Chan M, Harland M, Gillanders EM, Hayward NK, Avril MF, et al. High-risk melanoma susceptibility genes and pancreatic cancer, neural system tumors, and uveal melanoma across GenoMEL. Cancer Res 2006;66(20):9818–28. - PubMed
    1. Goldstein AM, Chan M, Harland M, Hayward NK, Demenais F, Bishop DT, et al. Features associated with germline CDKN2A mutations: a GenoMEL study of melanoma-prone families from three continents. J Med Genet 2007;44(2):99–106. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data