Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 16;11(5):e4683.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.4683.

Strategic Thinking to Improve Surgical Training in the United Kingdom

Affiliations
Review

Strategic Thinking to Improve Surgical Training in the United Kingdom

Daniel L Ashmore. Cureus. .

Abstract

Surgical training in the United Kingdom (UK) is facing crucial challenges. Multiple fundamental changes in recent years have meant the same high-quality training needs to be delivered in a shorter duration. In this review, we consider the current training pathways for surgery in the UK, the impact of the European Working Time Directive (EWTD), the ongoing issue of service delivery versus training, and briefly the new Junior Doctor contract and the effects of Brexit on surgical training. The purpose of the review is to attempt to apply strategic thinking and strategy development to improve the current state of surgical training given the current climate new trainees find themselves in. Strategic thinking and wicked issues are defined, and three umbrella suggestions to improve surgical training are explored. Whether these suggestions can be implemented with reference to different models of strategic decision making is discussed. Finally, despite a new pilot scheme aimed at improving surgical house officer (SHO) surgical training, little change is offered to current trainees. The impact this has on surgical trainees is discussed and suggestions on how they can make the most of the current climate are made in this article.

Keywords: surgical training; thinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. William Stewart Halsted: our surgical heritage. Cameron J. Ann Surg. 1997;225:445–458. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Surgeons: improving surgical training. [Apr;2018 ];Royal College of Surgeons. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/careers-in-surgery/trainees/ist/ London: Royal College of Surgeons England. 2018 :1–70.
    1. Increased working hours, simulation technology or competency based progression? What is the solution for surgical training? Sheikh Z. Surgery (Oxford) 2017;35:469–472.
    1. British Medical Association: Safe handover: safe patients. [May;2019 ];https://www.bma.org.uk/-/media/files/pdfs/practical%20advice%20at%20work... 2004
    1. Time for training: a review of the impact of the European Working Time Directive on the quality of training. [Apr;2018 ];Temple J. https://www.londonmedicine.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Temple%20Rep... 2010 :92.

LinkOut - more resources