Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;8(3):242-248.
doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.12.04.

The use of plasmakinetic cautery compared to conventional electrocautery for dissection of abdominal free flap for breast reconstruction: single-centre, randomized controlled study

Affiliations

The use of plasmakinetic cautery compared to conventional electrocautery for dissection of abdominal free flap for breast reconstruction: single-centre, randomized controlled study

Whitney T H Chow et al. Gland Surg. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The plasmakinetic cautery is a surgical dissection instrument that combines scalpel-like cutting precision with electrocautery-like haemostasis properties, and operates at lower temperatures (40-170 °C) than conventional electrocautery (200-350 °C). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical benefits of using plasmakinetic cautery in abdominal free flap dissection for breast reconstruction.

Methods: Forty women undergoing abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction (DIEP/MS-TRAM) were randomized to plasmakinetic cautery (n=20) or conventional electrocautery (n=20) for dissection of the abdominal free flap. Total abdominal wound drainage volume/duration, operation time and complications such as seroma and haematoma were examined.

Results: Age, body mass index, type of reconstruction and abdominal flap weight were similar in both groups. Mean abdominal drainage volume was (279±262) mL in conventional electrocautery group and (294±265) mL in plasmakinetic cautery group (P=0.853). Plasmakinetic cautery group mean drainage duration (4.3±2.2 days) was no difference compared to conventional diathermy group (3.8±2.0 days, P=0.501). Mean operation time in the conventional electrocautery group and plasmakinetic cautery group was 157±50 vs. 174±70 min respectively (P=0.195). There was more seroma detected in the conventional electrocautery group compared to plasmakinetic cautery group at days 7, 14 and 42 post-operation, but this was not statically significant. 2 haematomas in conventional diathermy group and 1 haematoms in the plasmakinetic cautery group required evacuation.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that there are no significant differences between the use of plasmakinetic cautery and conventional electrocautery for abdominal free flap dissection.

Keywords: Breast reconstruction; abdominal flap dissection; breast reconstruction complications; peak plasmablade; plasmakinetic cautery; seroma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dissecting abdominal free flap with plasmakinetic cautery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent of patients with seroma on postoperative days (POD) 7, 14 and 42 in conventional electrocautery group (blue) and plasmakinetic cautery group (red).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Research UK. Breast cancer incidence statistics. 2014; Available online: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st.... Accessed April 5, 2016.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellent. NICE guidance2009. Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment. Available online: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG80/chapter/1-Guidance#breast-reconstr.... Accessed April 5, 2016.
    1. Niddam J, Bosc R, Lange F, et al. DIEP flap for breast reconstruction: retrospective evaluation of patient satisfaction on abdominal results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:789-96. 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.02.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994;32:32-8. 10.1097/00000637-199401000-00007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blondeel PN. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:104-11. 10.1054/bjps.1998.3033 - DOI - PubMed