Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 Sep;36(3):264-277.
doi: 10.1111/hir.12269. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Translating the Cochrane EMBASE RCT filter from the Ovid interface to Embase.com: a case study

Julie Glanville  1 , Ruth Foxlee  2 , Susi Wisniewski  2 , Anna Noel-Storr  2 , Mary Edwards  1 , Gordon Dooley  3
Affiliations
Free article
Case Reports

Translating the Cochrane EMBASE RCT filter from the Ovid interface to Embase.com: a case study

Julie Glanville et al. Health Info Libr J. 2019 Sep.
Free article

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Health Info Libr J. 2020 Dec;37(4):351. doi: 10.1111/hir.12333. Health Info Libr J. 2020. PMID: 33369863 No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Information specialists frequently translate search filters from one interface to another. Publications advise that translation can be complex and should be undertaken carefully.

Objectives: To investigate the issues arising when translating the Cochrane Embase RCT search filter from one interface (Ovid) to another (Embase.com).

Methods: We drafted a translation of the Cochrane Ovid RCT filter to run in Embase.com. We compared the line-by-line results of the Ovid filter with the results of the translation. We revised the filter. We identified differences between database versions including records with different publication years and subject headings. Some records were in Embase in one interface but not in the other. We encountered expected interface differences relating to proximity operators. We also encountered unexpected interface issues around truncation and the use of the original title or original abstract field.

Discussion: Filter conversion is challenging and time consuming revealing unexpected differences in interfaces and databases. Careful planning can pre-empt some issues, but others may only emerge during testing. We identified interface anomalies that have led database publishers to review aspects of the way their interfaces work.

Conclusions: Translators should be vigilant for known and unknown differences in both interfaces and database versions.

Keywords: EMBASE; bibliographic databases; database searching; information retrieval; information specialists; research methodology; search strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Beynon, R., Leeflang, M. M., McDonald, S., Eisinga, A., Mitchell, R. L., Whiting, P., & Glanville, J. M. (2013). Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, Art. No. MR000022. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3
    1. Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2017). Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 9, 510-520. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1279
    1. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Appendix 2: Example search strategy to identify studies from electronic databases. In Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Healthcare. Retrieved from https://www.york.ac.uk/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htm. [last accessed 24 June 2019].
    1. Damarell, R. A., Tieman, J. J., & Sladek, R. M. (2013). OvidSP Medline-to-PubMed search filter translation: A methodology for extending search filter range to include PubMed's unique content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-86
    1. Dibden, A., Offman, J., Parmar, D., Jenkins, J., Slater, J., Binysh, K., & Duffy, S. W. (2014). Reduction in interval cancer rates following the introduction of two-view mammography in the UK breast screening programme. British Journal of Cancer, 110, 560-564. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.778. Embase identifier: 52932481.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources