Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;30(10):1005-1015.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13514. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study

Wiebe Derksen  1 , Daniel Wismeijer  1 , Tabea Flügge  2 , Bassam Hassan  1 , Ali Tahmaseb  1
Affiliations

The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study

Wiebe Derksen et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported drill guides based on CBCT scans and intraoral scanning.

Materials and methods: For partially edentulous patients, a prosthetic and surgical planning was completed in the guided surgery software (coDiagnostiX) and drill guides were 3D-printed accordingly. Three months after implant placement, an intraoral scan of the implant's position was used to evaluate the accuracy of placement using the coDiagnostiX treatment evaluation tool. Deviations were reported in degrees and in distance at implant's entry point and apex. Several risk factors, which might influence the accuracy, were evaluated separately: treated jaw, flap design, prior augmentations, amount of unrestored teeth, crowding, location of implants, cortical interference, and implant's length and diameter.

Results: A total of 66 patients received 145 Straumann tissue level implants that were eligible for accuracy analysis. The mean angular deviation was 2.72° ± 1.42. The mean three-dimensional deviation at the implant's entry point was 0.75 mm ± 0.34. At implant's apex, the mean was 1.06 mm ± 0.44. The amount of unrestored teeth (p = .002 & p = .003), the implant's location (p < .001), the implant's length (p = .004), and cortical interference (p = .033) had a significant influence on the accuracy of placement. Implant survival was 99.3% (n = 1 failed implant) at 12 and 24 months.

Conclusions: Guided surgery with tooth-supported drill guides made in a digital workflow is a feasible treatment option. However, deviations do occur and the implant's length, location, cortical interference and the amount of unrestored teeth have a significant influence on the accuracy.

Keywords: CAD/CAM; CT Imaging; clinical research; clinical trials; computer-aided implant surgery (CAIS); computer-assisted; digital impression; digital workflow; guided surgery; implant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Beretta, M., Poli, P. P., & Maiorana, C. (2014). Accuracy of computer-aided template-guided oral implant placement: A prospective clinical study. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 44, 184-193. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.4.184
    1. Brodala, N. (2009). Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 24(Suppl), 118-125.
    1. Cassetta, M., Di Mambro, A., Giansanti, M., Stefanelli, L. V., & Barbato, E. (2014). How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide? International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 43, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.06.012
    1. Cassetta, M., Giansanti, M., Di Mambro, A., Calasso, S., & Barbato, E. (2011). Accuracy of two stereolithographic surgical templates: A retrospective study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 15, 448-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00369.x
    1. Chen, S. T., & Buser, D. (2009). Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 24(Suppl), 186-217.

LinkOut - more resources