Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 22;20(1):449.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3543-9.

Outcomes for Pressure Ulcer Trials (OUTPUTs): protocol for the development of a core domain set for trials evaluating the clinical efficacy or effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention interventions

Anna Lechner  1 , Jan Kottner  2   3 , Susanne Coleman  4 , Delia Muir  4 , Heather Bagley  5 , Dimitri Beeckman  3   6   7   8 , Wendy Chaboyer  9 , Janet Cuddigan  10 , Zena Moore  11   12   13   14   15 , Claudia Rutherford  16   17 , Jochen Schmitt  18 , Jane Nixon  4 , Katrin Balzer  4   19
Affiliations

Outcomes for Pressure Ulcer Trials (OUTPUTs): protocol for the development of a core domain set for trials evaluating the clinical efficacy or effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention interventions

Anna Lechner et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Core outcome sets (COS) are being developed in many clinical areas to increase the quality and comparability of clinical trial results as well as to ensure their relevance for patients. A COS represents an agreed standardized set of outcomes that describes the minimum that should be consistently reported in all clinical trials of a defined area. It comprises a core domain set (defining what core outcomes should be measured) and a core measurement set (defining measurement/assessment instruments for each core domain). For pressure ulcer prevention trials a COS is lacking. The great heterogeneity of reported outcomes in this field indicates the need for a COS.

Methods/design: The first part of this project aims to develop a core domain set by following established methods, which incorporates four steps: (1) definition of the scope, (2) conducting a scoping review, (3) organizing facilitated workshops with service users, (4) performing Delphi surveys and establishing consensus in a face-to-face meeting with different stakeholders.

Discussion: After achieving consensus on the core domain set, further work will be undertaken to determine a corresponding core measurement set. This will lead to better pressure ulcer prevention research in the future. There are a number of methodological challenges in the field of COS development. To meet these challenges and to ensure a high-quality COS, the OUTPUTS project affiliates to current standards and works in close collaboration with international experts and with existing international service user groups.

Trial registration: The OUTPUTs project is registered in the COMET database: ( http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/283 ). Registered on 2015.

Keywords: Clinical trial; Core domain set; Core outcome set; Delphi; Dermatology; Patient reported outcome; Pressure ulcer; Prevention; Scoping review; Service user involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Guyatt GH, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):395–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias) J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407–415. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, et al. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(10):Mr000035. 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharif MO, et al. A systematic review of outcome measures used in clinical trials of treatment interventions following traumatic dental injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2015;31(6):422–428. doi: 10.1111/edt.12227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandhi GY, et al. Patient-important outcomes in registered diabetes trials. JAMA. 2008;299(21):2543–2549. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.21.2543. - DOI - PubMed