Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;121(4):351-358.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0524-4. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

How do women experience a false-positive test result from breast screening? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

Affiliations

How do women experience a false-positive test result from breast screening? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

Hannah Long et al. Br J Cancer. 2019 Aug.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: This is the first review to identify, appraise and synthesise women's experiences of having a false-positive breast screening test result.

Methods: We systematically searched eight databases for qualitative research reporting women's experiences of receiving a false-positive screening test result. Two reviewers independently screened articles. Eight papers reporting seven studies were included. Study quality was appraised. Data were thematically synthesised.

Results: Women passively attended screening in order to prove their perceived good health. Consequently, being recalled was unexpected, shocking and disempowering: women felt without options. They endured great uncertainty and stress and sought clarity about their health (e.g. by scrutinising the wording of recall letters and conversations with healthcare professionals). Their result was accompanied by relief and welcome feelings of certainty about their health, but some received unclear explanations of their result, contributing to lasting breast cancer-related worry and an ongoing need for further reassurance.

Conclusion: The organisation of breast screening programmes may constrain choice for women: they became passive recipients. The way healthcare professionals verbally communicate results to women may contribute to lasting breast cancer-related worry. Women need more reassurance, emotional support and answers to their questions before and during screening assessment, and after receiving their result.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study inclusion process

References

    1. Independent UK. Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. The Lancet. 2012;380:1778–1786. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;6:CD001877. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer. Breast cancer screening. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (WHO, Lyon, France, 2002).
    1. NHS Digital. Breast Screening Programme. https://files.digital.nhs.uk/pdf/m/f/breast_screening_programme__england..., cited 2019 Dec 16, [2017]
    1. Bolejko A, Zackrisson S, Hagell P, Wann‐Hansson C. A roller coaster of emotions and sense–coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of a false‐positive screening mammography. J. Clin. Nursing. 2014;23:2053–2062. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12426. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types