Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Nov;43(11):2747-2755.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05091-y.

Perioperative Fluid Restriction in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Perioperative Fluid Restriction in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Yanfei Shen et al. World J Surg. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Perioperative fluid management is a critical component in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. However, the benefit of restricted fluid regimen remains inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to explore potential factors causing these inconsistent findings.

Methods: The literature searches were performed in three databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library until August 30, 2018. Only randomized, controlled trials comparing the effect of restricted versus liberal regimen in abdominal surgery were included. The primary outcome was total postoperative complications. Subgroup analysis was performed according to between-group weight increase difference (≥ 2 kg and < 2 kg) and fluid intake ratio (≥ 1.8 and < 1.8).

Results: Sixteen studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The benefit of the restricted regimen in reducing postoperative complication was only significant in the subgroup with high weight increase difference (≥ 2 kg) (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.57-0.79) and the subgroup with high fluid intake ratio (≥ 1.8) (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.82). In the subgroup with low weight increase difference (< 2 kg) or low fluid intake ratio (< 1.8), the effect of the restricted regimen was not significant (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51-1.50, and RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.91-1.53, respectively).

Conclusions: The benefit of the restricted regimen was only significant in the subgroup with high weight increase difference (≥ 2 kg) or high fluid intake ratio (≥ 1.8).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Nutr. 2015 Jun;34(3):367-76 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 - PubMed
    1. Trials. 2009 Jul 07;10:50 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jul;103(1):25-32 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 2014 Feb;120(2):365-77 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources