Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Aug 6;8(15):e012121.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012121. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

Age-Related Trends in Home Blood Pressure, Home Pulse Rate, and Day-to-Day Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate Variability Based on Longitudinal Cohort Data: The Ohasama Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Age-Related Trends in Home Blood Pressure, Home Pulse Rate, and Day-to-Day Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate Variability Based on Longitudinal Cohort Data: The Ohasama Study

Michihiro Satoh et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Home blood pressure is a more accurate prognosticator than office blood pressure and allows the observation of day-to-day blood pressure variability. Information on blood pressure change during the life course links the prediction of blood pressure elevation with age. We prospectively assessed age-related trends in home blood pressure, home pulse rate, and their day-to-day variability evaluated as a coefficient of variation. Methods and Results We examined 1665 participants (men, 36.0%; mean age, 56.2 years) from the general population of Ohasama, Japan. A repeated-measures mixed linear model was used to estimate the age-related trends. In a mean of 15.9 years, we observed 5438 points of measurements including those at baseline. The home systolic blood pressure linearly increased with age and was higher in men than in women aged <70 years. There was an inverse-U-shaped age-related trend in home diastolic blood pressure. The day-to-day home systolic blood pressure linearly increased with age in individuals aged >40 years. However, an U-shaped age-related trend in day-to-day diastolic blood pressure variability with the nadir point at 65 to 69 years of age was observed. No significant sex differences in the day-to-day blood pressure variability were observed (P≥0.22). The average and day-to-day variability of home pulse rate decreased with age but were lower and higher, respectively, in men than in women. Conclusions The current descriptive data are needed to predict future home blood pressure and pulse rate. The data also provide information on the mechanism of day-to-day blood pressure and pulse rate variability.

Keywords: blood pressure; blood pressure measurement/monitoring; epidemiology; heart rate/heart rate variability; home blood pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age‐related trends in home BPs according to sex. The mixed model included age, sex, interaction term (age×sex), and the following parameters at baseline: body mass index, current smoking status, alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, history of cardiovascular disease, and antihypertensive medication use. BP indicates blood pressure. *P<0.05 vs women after adjusting with Tukey–Kramer test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Age‐related trends in CVs of home BPs according to sex. The mixed model included the same variables as those indicated in Figure 1. Bars indicate standard errors. There was no significant difference between women and men. BP indicates blood pressure; CV, coefficient of variation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Age‐related trends in home PR and CV of home PR according to sex. The mixed model included the same variables as those indicated in Figure 1. Bars indicate standard errors. CV indicates coefficient of variation; PR, pulse rate. *P<0.05 vs women after adjusting with Tukey–Kramer test.

References

    1. Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, Alexander L, Estep K, Hassen Abate K, Akinyemiju TF, Ali R, Alvis‐Guzman N, Azzopardi P, Banerjee A, Barnighausen T, Basu A, Bekele T, Bennett DA, Biadgilign S, Catala‐Lopez F, Feigin VL, Fernandes JC, Fischer F, Gebru AA, Gona P, Gupta R, Hankey GJ, Jonas JB, Judd SE, Khang YH, Khosravi A, Kim YJ, Kimokoti RW, Kokubo Y, Kolte D, Lopez A, Lotufo PA, Malekzadeh R, Melaku YA, Mensah GA, Misganaw A, Mokdad AH, Moran AE, Nawaz H, Neal B, Ngalesoni FN, Ohkubo T, Pourmalek F, Rafay A, Rai RK, Rojas‐Rueda D, Sampson UK, Santos IS, Sawhney M, Schutte AE, Sepanlou SG, Shifa GT, Shiue I, Tedla BA, Thrift AG, Tonelli M, Truelsen T, Tsilimparis N, Ukwaja KN, Uthman OA, Vasankari T, Venketasubramanian N, Vlassov VV, Vos T, Westerman R, Yan LL, Yano Y, Yonemoto N, Zaki ME, Murray CJ. Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990–2015. JAMA. 2017;317:165–182. - PubMed
    1. Mitsumata K, Saitoh S, Ohnishi H, Akasaka H, Miura T. Effects of parental hypertension on longitudinal trends in blood pressure and plasma metabolic profile: mixed‐effects model analysis. Hypertension. 2012;60:1124–1130. - PubMed
    1. Loucks EB, Abrahamowicz M, Xiao Y, Lynch JW. Associations of education with 30 year life course blood pressure trajectories: Framingham Offspring Study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:139. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niiranen TJ, Henglin M, Claggett B, Muggeo VMR, McCabe E, Jain M, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Cheng S. Trajectories of blood pressure elevation preceding hypertension onset: an analysis of the Framingham Heart Study Original Cohort. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:427–431. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Safar ME, Lange C, Blacher J, Eschwege E, Tichet J, Balkau B; Group DS . Mean and yearly changes in blood pressure with age in the metabolic syndrome: the DESIR study. Hypertens Res. 2011;34:91–97. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources