Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 5:10:1530.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01530. eCollection 2019.

Virtual Reality in Marketing: A Framework, Review, and Research Agenda

Affiliations
Review

Virtual Reality in Marketing: A Framework, Review, and Research Agenda

Mariano Alcañiz et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Marketing scholars and practitioners are showing increasing interest in Extended Reality (XR) technologies (XRs), such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), as very promising technological tools for producing satisfactory consumer experiences that mirror those experienced in physical stores. However, most of the studies published to date lack a certain measure of methodological rigor in their characterization of XR technologies and in the assessment techniques used to characterize the consumer experience, which limits the generalization of the results. We argue that it is necessary to define a rigorous methodological framework for the use of XRs in marketing. This article reviews the literature on XRs in marketing, and provides a conceptual framework to organize this disparate body of work.

Keywords: 3D user interface; consumer neuroscience; e-commerce; marketing; presence; psychophysiological assessment; virtual commerce; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Classification for contents in VEM.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Methodological framework for VEM.

References

    1. Alcañiz M., Bigné E., Guixeres J. (2017). Neuromarketing: midiendo en realidad y en realidad mixta. Investig. Mark. 134 5–9.
    1. Alcañiz M., Chicchi Giglioli I. A., Parra Vargas E. (2018). Virtual reality as an emerging methodology for leadership assessment and training. Front. Psychol. 9:1658. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01658 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alcañiz M., Lozano J. A., Rey B. (2003). Technological background of VR. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 99 199–214. - PubMed
    1. Allimamy S., Deans K. R., Gnoth J. (2019). The effect of co-creation through exposure to augmented reality on customer perceived risk, trust and purchase intent – an empirical analysis. Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact. 7 103–117.
    1. Alshaal S. E., Michael S., Pamporis A., Herodotou H., Samaras G., Andreou P. (2016). “Enhancing virtual reality systems with smart wearable devices,” in Proceedings of the 2016 17th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM), Vol. 1 Porto, 345–348.