Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;8(4):301-314.
doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

Moving fast, thinking fast: The relations of physical activity levels and bouts to neuroelectric indices of inhibitory control in preadolescents

Affiliations

Moving fast, thinking fast: The relations of physical activity levels and bouts to neuroelectric indices of inhibitory control in preadolescents

Dominika M Pindus et al. J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Structured vigorous physical activity (VPA) can improve cognitive control in children, but studies relating daily physical activity (PA) to cognitive control have yielded conflicting findings. While objectively measured daily PA summarizes all occurrences of PA within a registered period, a minimum duration of continuous PA is required for registration of a PA bout. Because brief bouts of high-intensity PA can account for a large proportion of children's daily activity-related energy expenditure, this study assessed whether daily and bouted VPA were selectively related to cognitive control in preadolescents relative to other PA intensities.

Methods: A total of 75 children between the ages of 8 and 10 years (49% girls) wore an ActiGraph wGT3X+ on the hip for 7 days. The acceleration signal from the vertical axis was summarized over 1 s, 5 s, and 15 s epochs. Daily and bouted moderate PA, moderate-to-vigorous PA, and VPA were measured. PA bouts were expressed as the frequency and time spent in 2 different continuous PA bouts, one lasting ≥10 s and the other lasting ≥30 s at a given intensity. Inhibitory control was assessed using behavioral responses to a modified flanker task (mean reaction time (RTmean) and accuracy). Attentional resource allocation and cognitive processing speed were measured using the amplitude and latency of the P3 component of event-related brain potentials, respectively. Associations between PA, behavioral indices of inhibitory control, P3 amplitude, and latency were assessed using hierarchical regression models.

Results: Daily VPA was not related to RTmean or accuracy on either congruent or incongruent trials. In contrast, more time spent in VPA bouts lasting ≥30 s predicted shorter P3 latency across epochs and flanker congruencies (all β ≤ -0.24, all p ≤ 0.04). The associations between shorter P3 latency and the time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA bouts lasting ≥30 s were less consistent and largely limited to congruent trials (congruent: β (-0.31, -0.34)). No significant associations were observed upon correction for false discovery rate.

Conclusion: The pattern of uncorrected associations aligns with the dose-response literature and suggests that brief VPA bouts may yield the greatest benefits to cognitive processing speed in preadolescents. Future studies using measures of brain structure and function are needed to understand the mechanisms linking bouted VPA to neurocognitive function during childhood.

Keywords: Accelerometry; Bouts; Children; ERPs; Inhibitory control; P3; Physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Image, graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
The relations of the time spent in bouts of VPA lasting ≥30 s to P3 latency on congruent (A) and incongruent (B) trials across epochs. The X axis presents regression residuals where time spent in VPA bouts was regressed on age, accelerometer wear time, and VO2peak percentile (A), and age, IQ, pubertal stage, accelerometer wear time, and VO2peak percentile (B). IQ = intelligence quotient; VO2peak = peak oxygen uptake; VPA = vigorous physical activity.

References

    1. Cooper A.R., Goodman A., Page A.S., Sherar L.B., Esliger D.W., van Sluijs E.M. Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in youth: the International children's accelerometry database (ICAD) Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:113. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ng M., Fleming T., Robinson M., Thomson B., Graetz N., Margono C. Global, regional and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults 1980-2013: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2014;384:766–781. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esteban-Cornejo I., Cadenas-Sanchez C., Contreras-Rodriguez O., Verdejo-Roman J., Mora-Gonzalez J., Migueles J.H. A whole brain volumetric approach in overweight/obese children: examining the association with different physical fitness components and academic performance. The ActiveBrains project. Neuroimage. 2017;159:346–354. - PubMed
    1. Chaddock L., Erickson K.I., Prakash R.S., Kim J.S., Voss M.W., Vanpatter M. A neuroimaging investigation of the association between aerobic fitness, hippocampal volume, and memory performance in preadolescent children. Brain Res. 2010;1358:172–183. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hillman C.H., Pontifex M.B., Castelli D.M., Khan N.A., Raine L.B., Scudder M.R. Effects of the FITKids randomized controlled trial on executive control and brain function. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e1063–e1071. - PMC - PubMed