Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 16;7(5):e2240.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002240. eCollection 2019 May.

An Update on Measures of Preoperative Glycemic Control

Affiliations

An Update on Measures of Preoperative Glycemic Control

Ledibabari M Ngaage et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Glycemic control represents a modifiable preoperative risk factor in surgery. Traditionally, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and plasma glucose are utilized as measures of glycemic control. However, studies show mixed results regarding the ability of these conventional measures to predict adverse surgical outcomes. This may be explained by the time window captured by HbA1c and serum glucose: long-term and immediate glycemic control, respectively. Fructosamine, glycosylated albumin, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol constitute alternative metrics of glycemic control that are of growing interest but are underutilized in the field of surgery. These nontraditional measures reflect the temporal variations in glycemia over the preceding days to weeks. Therefore, they may more accurately reflect glycemic control within the time window that most significantly affects surgical outcomes. Additionally, these alternative measures are predictive of negative outcomes, even in the nondiabetic population and in patients with chronic renal disease and anemia, for whom HbA1c performs poorly. Adopting these newer metrics of glycemia may enhance the value of preoperative evaluation, such that the effectiveness of any preoperative glycemic control interventions can be assessed, and adverse outcomes associated with hyperglycemia better predicted. The goal of this review is to provide an update on the preoperative management of glycemia and to describe alternative metrics that may improve our ability to predict and control for the negative outcomes associated with poor glycemic control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Time periods of glycemic control measurements for traditional and emerging glycemic indices. CBG, capillary blood glucose.

References

    1. Ibrahim AM, Shuster M, Koolen PG, et al. Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1057–1066. - PubMed
    1. Goltsman D, Morrison KA, Ascherman JA. Defining the association between diabetes and plastic surgery outcomes: an analysis of nearly 40,000 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1461. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bamba R, Gupta V, Shack RB, et al. Evaluation of diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for major complications in patients undergoing aesthetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:598–608. - PubMed
    1. Dortch JD, Eck DL, Ladlie B, et al. Perioperative glycemic control in plastic surgery: review and discussion of an institutional protocol. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:821–830. - PubMed
    1. Golden SH, Peart-Vigilance C, Kao WH, et al. Perioperative glycemic control and the risk of infectious complications in a cohort of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1408–1414. - PubMed