Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;10(7):e00067.
doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000067.

Primer on Precision Medicine for Complex Chronic Disorders

Affiliations

Primer on Precision Medicine for Complex Chronic Disorders

David C Whitcomb. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Precision medicine promises patients with complex disorders the right treatment for the right patient at the right dose at the right time with expectation of better health at a lower cost. The demand for precision medicine highlights the limitations of modern Western medicine. Modern Western medicine is a population-based, top-down approach that uses pathology to define disease. Precision medicine is a bottom-up approach that identifies predisease disorders using genetics, biomarkers, and modeling to prevent disease. This primer demonstrates the contrasting strengths and limitations of each paradigm and why precision medicine will eventually deliver on the promises.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Therapeutic trials using clinicopathologic disease criteria. (a) Randomized clinical trials attempt to reduce heterogeneity by selecting the maximum number of patients with the least variability in disease features using inclusion–exclusion criteria. In CCDs, the treatment response is mixed with the NNT >>1. The patients with the highest burden of disease and in need of effective treatment are excluded from traditional clinical drug trials. (b) The same disease population seen as a function of multiple underlying disorders (colored curves) that may be a function of a single or multiple factors. A RCT targeting a low-severity mechanism (blue curve) will have “strong evidence” of effectiveness in the RCT, but will be of no value in more severe disease mechanisms (yellow, orange, and red curves). New approaches are needed to apply drug trials to mechanisms rather than common symptoms. CCD, complex chronic diseases; NNT, number needed to treat; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effect of defining genetic risk factors in defined subpopulations to improve biomarker performance. In this example (a biomarker with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 85%), the identification of high-risk genetic risk factors moves a patient from a low-risk population (e.g., 1% prevalence) or patients with some disease symptoms (10% prevalence) to a subpopulation of patients with a high disease prevalence (e.g., 30%). Knowing the underlying mechanistic disorder through genetic analysis also adds specificity and also provides possible treatment targets.

References

    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Health and Economic Costs of Chronic Diseases (https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/costs/index.htm) (2019). Accessed March 4, 2019.
    1. Atkinson AJJ, Colburn WA, DeGruttola VG, et al. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001;69(3):89–95. - PubMed
    1. Beck AH. STUDENT JAMA. The Flexner report and the standardization of American medical education. JAMA 2004;291(17):2139–40. - PubMed
    1. Flexner A. Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No. 4. New York, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, p. 346, OCLC 9795002. 1910. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whitcomb DC. What is personalized medicine and what should it replace? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9(7):418–24. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types