Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 22;10(7):215.
doi: 10.3390/insects10070215.

Local and Landscape Effects to Biological Controls in Urban Agriculture-A Review

Affiliations
Review

Local and Landscape Effects to Biological Controls in Urban Agriculture-A Review

Joshua E Arnold et al. Insects. .

Abstract

Urban agriculture is widely practiced throughout the world. Urban agriculture practitioners have diverse motivations and circumstances, but one problem is ubiquitous across all regions: insect pests. Many urban farmers and gardeners either choose to, or are required to forego, the use of chemical controls for pest outbreaks because of costs, overspray in populated areas, public health, and environmental concerns. An alternative form of pest control is conservation biological control (CBC)-a form of ecological pest management-that can reduce the severity of pest outbreaks and crop damage. Urban farmers relying on CBC often assume that diversification practices similar to those used in rural farms may reduce insect pest populations and increase populations of beneficial insects, yet these management practices may be inappropriate for applications in fragmented urban environments. In this review, we assess urban CBC research and provide a synthesis for urban agriculture practitioners. Our findings indicate that local and landscape factors differentially affect insect pests and beneficial arthropods across the reviewed studies, and we identify several on-farm practices that can be implemented to increase biological control in urban agriculture.

Keywords: conservation biological control; diversification; ecological agriculture; habitat management; pest management; urban agriculture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of taxa studied in the reviewed published literature. Height of the bar represents the number of studies for each taxa. Blue coloration represents predator or parasitoid groups, orange represents pest groups considered in each study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Numbers along the center y-axis represent the number of reportable results in the reviewed literature that indicate a positive effect to natural enemy richness, abundance, and rates of biological control. Reported results are correlated with explanatory variables (local factors) listed on the exterior of the radar chart.

References

    1. Zezza A., Tasciotti L. Urban Agriculture, Poverty, and Food Security: Empirical Evidence from a Sample of Developing Countries. Food Policy. 2010;35:265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.007. - DOI
    1. Mok H.-F., Williamson V.G., Grove J.R., Burry K., Barker S.F., Hamilton A.J. Strawberry Fields Forever? Urban Agriculture in Developed Countries: A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2014;34:21–43. doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0156-7. - DOI
    1. Lawson L.J., Drake L. Community Gardening Organization Survey. American Community Gardening Association; Columbus, OH, USA: 2012. p. 29.
    1. Clinton N., Stuhlmacher M., Miles A., Uludere Aragon N., Wagner M., Georgescu M., Herwig C., Gong P. A Global Geospatial Ecosystem Services Estimate of Urban Agriculture. Earth’s Future. 2018;6:40–60. doi: 10.1002/2017EF000536. - DOI
    1. Oberholtzer L., Dimitri C., Pressman A. Organic agriculture in U.S. urban areas building bridges between organic farms and education; Proceedings of the Practitioners’ Track, IFOAM Organic World Congress 2014; Istanbul, Turkey. 13–15 October 2014.