Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 11;16(14):2476.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142476.

How Does Internal and External CSR Affect Employees' Work Engagement? Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms and Boundary Conditions

Affiliations

How Does Internal and External CSR Affect Employees' Work Engagement? Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms and Boundary Conditions

Yu Jia et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

We investigate the different mechanisms concerning how employees' perceptions of external and internal corporate social responsibility (CSR) serve to influence employees' work engagement. By combining social exchange theory and social identity theory, we implement and examine an integrated moderated mediation framework in which employees' value orientations (e.g., collectivism or individualism) impact the mediating mechanism between their perceived external and internal CSR, organizational pride and perceived organizational support (POS), and work engagement. This work fills a research gap to examine the indirect relationship between employees' perceptions of external and internal CSR and work engagement. Using two periods of survey data from 250 working employees in China, we find that employees' perceptions of external CSR positively influence work engagement via organizational pride. The value of collectivism strengthens the direct effect of employees' perceptions of external CSR on work engagement, and the indirect effect of employees' perceptions of external CSR on work engagement via organizational pride. Moreover, employees' perceptions of internal CSR positively influence work engagement via POS. The value of individualism strengthens the direct effect of employees' perceptions of internal CSR on work engagement, and the indirect effect of employees' perceptions of internal CSR on work engagement via POS. The results contribute to both theory and practice.

Keywords: collectivism; corporate social responsibility; individualism; organizational pride; perceived organizational support; work engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The conceptual model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The interactive effect of external corporate social responsibility (CSR) and collectivism on organizational pride.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The interactive effect of internal CSR and individualism on perceived organizational support (POS).

References

    1. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., Sanz-Vergel A.I. Burnout and work engagement: The JD-R approach. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2014;1:389–411. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235. - DOI
    1. Christian M.S., Garza A.S., Slaughter J.E. Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Pers. Psychol. 2011;64:89–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x. - DOI
    1. Harter J.K., Schmidt F.L., Hayes T.L. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002;87:268–279. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farid T., Iqbal S., Ma J., Castro-Gonzalez S., Khattak A., Khan M.K. Employees’ Perceptions of CSR, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Effects of Organizational Justice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:1731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101731. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B., Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2006;66:701–716. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources