Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 30;38(22):4218-4239.
doi: 10.1002/sim.8282. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

Mixed-effects models for slope-based endpoints in clinical trials of chronic kidney disease

Affiliations

Mixed-effects models for slope-based endpoints in clinical trials of chronic kidney disease

Edward Vonesh et al. Stat Med. .

Erratum in

Abstract

In March of 2018, the National Kidney Foundation, in collaboration with the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, sponsored a workshop in which surrogate endpoints other than currently established event-time endpoints for clinical trials in chronic kidney disease (CKD) were presented and discussed. One such endpoint is a slope-based parameter describing the rate of decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time. There are a number of challenges that can complicate such slope-based analyses in CKD trials. These include the possibility of an early but short-term acute treatment effect on the slope, both within-subject and between-subject heteroscedasticity, and informative censoring resulting from patient dropout due to death or onset of end-stage kidney disease. To address these issues, we first consider a class of mixed-effects models for eGFR that are linear in the parameters describing the mean eGFR trajectory but which are intrinsically nonlinear when a power-of-mean variance structure is used to model within-subject heteroscedasticity. We then combine the model for eGFR with a model for time to dropout to form a class of shared parameter models which, under the right specification of shared random effects, can minimize bias due to informative censoring. The models and methods of analysis are described and illustrated using data from two CKD studies one of which was one of 56 studies made available to the workshop analytical team. Lastly, methodology and accompanying software for prospectively determining sample size/power estimates are presented.

Keywords: acute and chronic slopes; informative censoring; linear spline mixed-effects models; power-of-mean; shared parameter models.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Schoenfeld DA. Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. Biometrics. 1983;39:499-503.
    1. Levey AS, Inker LA, Matsushita K, et al. GFR decline as an end point for clinical trials in CKD: a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(6):821-835.
    1. Inker LA, Lambers Heerspink HJ, Mondal H, et al. GFR decline as an alternative end point to kidney failure in clinical trials: a meta-analysis of treatment effects from 37 randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(6):848-859.
    1. Lambers Heerspink HJ, Tighiouart H, Sang Y, et al. GFR decline and subsequent risk of established kidney outcomes: a meta-analysis of 37 randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(6):860-866.
    1. Greene T, Tang C-C, Inker LA, et al. Utility and validity of estimated GFR-based surrogate time-to-event end points in CKD: a simulation study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(6):867-879.

Publication types