Mortality after liver surgery in Germany
- PMID: 31339558
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11236
Mortality after liver surgery in Germany
Abstract
Background: Mortality rates after liver surgery are not well documented in Germany. More than 1000 hospitals offer liver resection, but there is no central regulation of infrastructure requirements or outcome quality.
Methods: Hospital mortality rates after liver resection were analysed using the standardized hospital discharge data (Diagnosis-Related Groups, ICD-10 and German operations and procedure key codes) provided by the Research Data Centre of the Federal Statistical Office and Statistical Offices of the Länder in Wiesbaden, Germany.
Results: A total of 110 332 liver procedures carried out between 2010 and 2015 were identified. The overall hospital mortality rate for all resections was 5·8 per cent. The mortality rate among 17 574 major hepatic procedures was 10·4 per cent. Patients who had surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) had the lowest mortality rate among those with malignancy (5·5 per cent), followed by patients with gallbladder cancer (7·1 per cent), hepatocellular carcinoma (9·3 per cent) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (11·0 per cent). Patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had the highest mortality rate (14·6 per cent). The mortality rate for extended hepatectomy was 16·2 per cent and the need for a biliodigestive anastomosis increased this to 25·5 per cent. Failure to rescue after complications led to mortality rates of more than 30 per cent in some subgroups. There was a significant volume-outcome relationship for CRLM surgery in very high-volume centres (mean 26-60 major resections for CRLMs per year). The mortality rate was 4·6 per cent in very high-volume centres compared with 7·5 per cent in very low-volume hospitals (odds ratio 0·60, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 0·77; P < 0·001).
Conclusion: This analysis of outcome data after liver resection in Germany suggests that hospital mortality remains high. There should be more focused research to understand, improve or justify factors leading to this result, and consideration of centralization of liver surgery.
Antecedentes: En Alemania, los datos de mortalidad después de la cirugía no están bien documentados. En más de 1.000 hospitales se realizan resecciones hepáticas, pero no existe una regulación central de los prerrequisitos estructurales necesarios y de la calidad de los resultados. MÉTODOS: Las tasas de mortalidad hospitalaria relacionadas con las resecciones hepáticas se analizaron utilizando los datos estandarizados del alta hospitalaria (Diagnóstico de grupos relacionados, DRG), la clasificación internacional de enfermedades 10 (ICD10) y la clave de procedimientos y operaciones (códigos OPS) proporcionados por el RDC de la Oficina Federal de Estadística y Oficinas de Estadística de Länder en Wiesbaden, Alemania.
Resultados: Se identificaron un total de 110.332 procedimientos hepáticos (de 2010 a 2015). La tasa global de mortalidad hospitalaria para todas las resecciones fue del 5,8%. Las resecciones hepáticas mayores (n = 15.333) presentaron una mortalidad del 10,4%. Los pacientes con metástasis hepáticas colorrectales (colorectal liver metastases, CRLM) tuvieron la mortalidad más baja de entre los pacientes con neoplasias malignas (5,5%), seguidos de los pacientes con cáncer de vesícula biliar (7,1%), colangiocarcinoma intrahepático (intrahepatic colangiocarcinoma, iCC) (11,0%) y carcinoma hepatocelular (hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC) (9,3%). Los pacientes con colangiocarcinoma extrahepático (extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, eCC) presentaron la mortalidad más alta (14,6%). Las hepatectomías extendidas (16,2%) y la necesidad de una anastomosis biliodigestiva (biliodigestive anastomosis, BDA) aumentaron la mortalidad a un 25,5%. La falta de solución de algunas complicaciones llevó a tasas de mortalidad de más del 30% en algunos subgrupos. Hubo una relación significativa volumen-resultado para las CRLM en centros de alto volumen (25,3 a 59,7 resecciones mayores/año; razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR 0,60, i.c. del 95%: 0,42-0,77; P < 0,001), lo que resultó en una disminución en las tasas de mortalidad de 7,5/6,4/7,5/6,5% a 4,6%. CONCLUSIÓN: El análisis de los resultados después de la resección hepática en Alemania muestra una alta mortalidad hospitalaria inesperada. Este análisis indica la necesidad de efectuar una investigación más específica para comprender, mejorar o justificar los factores que determinan estos hallazgos.
© 2019 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
[Unexpectedly high mortality after surgical liver interventions in Germany].Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Jan;196(1):98-100. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01547-1. Strahlenther Onkol. 2020. PMID: 31732781 German. No abstract available.
-
Beyond the scalpel - mortality after liver surgery in patients with liver metastases - time to rethink the indications.Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):149. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11412. Br J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31869462 No abstract available.
-
Author response to: Beyond the scalpel - mortality after liver surgery in patients with liver metastases - time to rethink the indications: Total quality control and just culture for oncologic therapies urgently required!Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):149-150. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11411. Br J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31869468 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Defining perioperative risk after hepatectomy based on diagnosis and extent of resection.J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Nov;18(11):1917-28. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2634-x. Epub 2014 Sep 9. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014. PMID: 25199947
-
Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery.Br J Surg. 2014 Jun;101(7):836-46. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9492. Epub 2014 Apr 23. Br J Surg. 2014. PMID: 24760705
-
Hospital volume and mortality in liver resections for colorectal metastasis using population-based administrative data.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019 Dec;26(12):548-556. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.680. Epub 2019 Oct 24. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019. PMID: 31562836
-
[Robot-assisted liver resection].Chirurg. 2017 Jun;88(6):476-483. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0415-2. Chirurg. 2017. PMID: 28405715 Review. German.
-
[Surgical margin status in hepatectomy for liver tumors].Bull Cancer. 2008 Dec;95(12):1183-91. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2008.0758. Bull Cancer. 2008. PMID: 19091652 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Digestive and breast cancer patients managed during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic: Short and middle term outcomes.World J Methodol. 2024 Jun 20;14(2):92612. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.92612. eCollection 2024 Jun 20. World J Methodol. 2024. PMID: 38983654 Free PMC article.
-
Contributing factors to severe complications after liver resection: an aggregate root cause analysis in 105 consecutive patients.Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Sep 29;14:36. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00261-7. eCollection 2020. Patient Saf Surg. 2020. PMID: 33014137 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of perioperative steroid administration in patients undergoing elective liver resection: meta-analysis.BJS Open. 2022 Nov 2;6(6):zrac139. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac139. BJS Open. 2022. PMID: 36537738 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting liver regeneration following major resection.Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 4;12(1):13396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16968-9. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35927556 Free PMC article.
-
Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy Strategies in Patients with Unresectable or Borderline Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Evidence for a Lack of Focus on Resection Rates.Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7624-7632. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14049-3. Epub 2023 Aug 30. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37644249 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Nimptsch U, Krautz C, Weber GF, Mansky T, Grützmann R. Nationwide in-hospital mortality following pancreatic surgery in Germany is higher than anticipated. Ann Surg 2016; 264: 1082-1090.
-
- Vonlanthen R, Lodge P, Barkun JS, Farges O, Rogiers X, Soreide K et al. Toward a consensus on centralization in surgery. Ann Surg 2018; 268: 712-724.
-
- Nimptsch U, Mansky T. Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e016184.
-
- Kim W, Wolff S, Ho V. Measuring the volume-outcome relation for complex hospital surgery. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2016; 14: 453-464.
-
- Belghiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev E, Garden JO, Lau WY, Makuuchi M et al. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000; 2: 333-339.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical