The effects of a positional feedback device on rollator walker use: a validation study
- PMID: 31339810
- DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1637380
The effects of a positional feedback device on rollator walker use: a validation study
Abstract
Background: According to clinical guidelines, rolling walker users should walk with their feet between the posterior wheels of the walker; however approximately 50% of users do not.
Objective: To describe the development and effects of a custom device designed to attach to a walker and provide visual feedback to encourage improved user position.
Methods: Fourteen older adults participated in this study to validate the effects of this device when a 10% decrease in the users' habitual distance away from the walker was encouraged via feedback. Users' relative distances were recorded using a non-contact distance sensor within the device, while kinematics were measured using commercial wearable wireless inertial sensors.
Results: Individuals were able to ambulate on average 20% closer or more to their walker when prescribed the visual feedback. This was primarily achieved through a reduction in shoulder flexion. Trunk and cervical postures were less generalizable as only small and variable changes were observed.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that the device has promise, as individuals attended to the device and walked in a position closer to that recommended by clinical guidelines. The device did not appear to improve posture. Future work is needed to determine long-term effects.
Keywords: kinematics of walker users; mobility aids; older adults; rolling walkers; stability and posture; visual feedback.
Similar articles
-
Postural and Metabolic Benefits of Using a Forearm Support Walker in Older Adults With Impairments.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr;100(4):638-647. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 24. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 30367875 Clinical Trial.
-
[Recognition and classification of posture and gait patterns of rollator users by distance measurements-a comparison between clinical assessment and automatic classification].Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Mar;53(2):129-137. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01544-0. Epub 2019 Apr 17. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2020. PMID: 30997555 German.
-
Kinematic comparison of the use of walking sticks versus a rolling walker during gait in adult degenerative scoliosis patients.Spine Deform. 2020 Aug;8(4):717-723. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00084-7. Epub 2020 Mar 2. Spine Deform. 2020. PMID: 32124399
-
Walkers with Wheels Versus Walkers Without Wheels for Fall Prevention in Older Adults: A Review of the Comparative Clinical Effectiveness [Internet].Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019 Jul 22. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019 Jul 22. PMID: 31545569 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Evidence for the Effectiveness of Feedback from Wearable Inertial Sensors during Work-Related Activities: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;21(19):6377. doi: 10.3390/s21196377. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34640695 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluating Gait Stability and Muscle Activation in Different Hand Holding Conditions Using the Robotic Walker-mTPAD.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;23(13):5996. doi: 10.3390/s23135996. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37447845 Free PMC article.
-
Virtual Obstacle Avoidance Strategy: Navigating through a Complex Environment While Interacting with Virtual and Physical Elements.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;24(19):6212. doi: 10.3390/s24196212. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39409252 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources