Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 23;9(3):92.
doi: 10.3390/bios9030092.

Microbial Fuel Cell-Based Biosensors

Affiliations
Review

Microbial Fuel Cell-Based Biosensors

Yang Cui et al. Biosensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a promising environmental biotechnology that has been proposed mainly for power production and wastewater treatment. Though small power output constrains its application for directly operating most electrical devices, great progress in its chemical, electrochemical, and microbiological aspects has expanded the applications of MFCs into other areas such as the generation of chemicals (e.g., formate or methane), bioremediation of contaminated soils, water desalination, and biosensors. In recent decades, MFC-based biosensors have drawn increasing attention because of their simplicity and sustainability, with applications ranging from the monitoring of water quality (e.g., biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), toxicants) to the detection of air quality (e.g., carbon monoxide, formaldehyde). In this review, we summarize the status quo of MFC-based biosensors, putting emphasis on BOD and toxicity detection. Furthermore, this review covers other applications of MFC-based biosensors, such as DO and microbial activity. Further, challenges and prospects of MFC-based biosensors are briefly discussed.

Keywords: BOD; biosensors; environmental monitoring; microbial fuel cells; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagrams of (A) a biosensor [20], (B) a dual-chamber microbial fuel cell (MFC) and (C) an MFC-based biosensor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Schematic diagram of the membrane-less single-chamber MFC-based BOD sensor [25]. (B) Schematic diagram of the three-stage MFCs as BOD sensor and compliance of predicted BOD5 values with five-day BOD test (BOD5). y = x is shown as the “ideal” prediction [57].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Photographs or schematics of MFC toxicity sensors: (A) membrane-based electrodes [77], (B) abiotic cathode sensing element [78], (C) miniature MFC with air bubble trap [79], (D) paper MFC [80], and (E) shared cathode [81].

References

    1. Kim J.D., Kim D.J., Byun H.G., Ham Y.K., Jung W.S., Han D.W., Park J.S., Lee H.L. The definition of basic TEDS of IEEE 1451.4 for sensors for an electronic tongue and the proposal of new template TEDS for electrochemical devices. Talanta. 2007;71:1642–1651. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2006.07.049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson C.B. Sensors in medicine. BMJ. 1999;319:1288. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7220.1288. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez-Mozaz S., Lopez De Alda M.J., Barceló D. Biosensors as useful tools for environmental analysis and monitoring. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2006;386:1025–1041. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0574-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perumal V., Hashim U. Advances in biosensors: Principle, architecture and applications. J. Appl. Biomed. 2014;12:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jab.2013.02.001. - DOI
    1. Conroy P.J., Hearty S., Leonard P., O’Kennedy R.J. Antibody production, design and use for biosensor-based applications. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009;20:10–26. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.01.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources