Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Jul 24:366:l4225.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4225.

Diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure in critically ill adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure in critically ill adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

Shannon M Fernando et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To summarise and compare the accuracy of physical examination, computed tomography (CT), sonography of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), and transcranial Doppler pulsatility index (TCD-PI) for the diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in critically ill patients.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: Six databases, including Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed, from inception to 1 September 2018.

Study selection criteria: English language studies investigating accuracy of physical examination, imaging, or non-invasive tests among critically ill patients. The reference standard was ICP of 20 mm Hg or more using invasive ICP monitoring, or intraoperative diagnosis of raised ICP.

Data extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies tool. Summary estimates were generated using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) model.

Results: 40 studies (n=5123) were included. Of physical examination signs, pooled sensitivity and specificity for increased ICP were 28.2% (95% confidence interval 16.0% to 44.8%) and 85.9% (74.9% to 92.5%) for pupillary dilation, respectively; 54.3% (36.6% to 71.0%) and 63.6% (46.5% to 77.8%) for posturing; and 75.8% (62.4% to 85.5%) and 39.9% (26.9% to 54.5%) for Glasgow coma scale of 8 or less. Among CT findings, sensitivity and specificity were 85.9% (58.0% to 96.4%) and 61.0% (29.1% to 85.6%) for compression of basal cisterns, respectively; 80.9% (64.3% to 90.9%) and 42.7% (24.0% to 63.7%) for any midline shift; and 20.7% (13.0% to 31.3%) and 89.2% (77.5% to 95.2%) for midline shift of at least 10 mm. The pooled area under the ROC (AUROC) curve for ONSD sonography was 0.94 (0.91 to 0.96). Patient level data from studies using TCD-PI showed poor performance for detecting raised ICP (AUROC for individual studies ranging from 0.55 to 0.72).

Conclusions: Absence of any one physical examination feature is not sufficient to rule out elevated ICP. Substantial midline shift could suggest elevated ICP, but the absence of shift cannot rule it out. ONSD sonography might have use, but further studies are needed. Suspicion of elevated ICP could necessitate treatment and transfer, regardless of individual non-invasive tests.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42018105642.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flowchart summarising evidence search and study selection
Fig 2
Fig 2
Pooled area under the ROC curve for diagnostic accuracy of sonography of the optic nerve sheath diameter to detect intracranial pressure of 20 mm Hg or more across studies. *Reported upper limit of 95% confidence interval not symmetrical with the lower limit in the original or logit scale. Therefore, only values with their lower confidence limits were used, and symmetry in the logit scale was assumed for the meta-analysis
Fig 3
Fig 3
Generated receiver operating characteristic curves for diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler-pulsatility index for intracranial pressure of 20 mm Hg or more, as based on individual patient level data from four studies. AUROC=area under receiver operating characteristic curve
None

Comment in

References

    1. Mollan SP, Spitzer D, Nicholl DJ. Raised intracranial pressure in those presenting with headache. BMJ 2018;363:k3252. 10.1136/bmj.k3252. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Lavinio A, Czosnyka Z, Pickard JD. A synopsis of brain pressures: which? when? are they all useful? Neurol Res 2007;29:672-9. 10.1179/016164107X240053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Citerio G, Andrews PJ. Intracranial pressure. Part two: Clinical applications and technology. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:1882-5. 10.1007/s00134-004-2377-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stocchetti N, Maas AI. Traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2121-30. 10.1056/NEJMra1208708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cahill J, Calvert JW, Zhang JH. Mechanisms of early brain injury after subarachnoid haemorrhage [correction in: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2006;26:1463]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2006;26:1341-53. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600283. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms