Never events in general practice: a focus group study exploring the views of English and Scottish general practitioners of 'never events'
- PMID: 31340968
- PMCID: PMC6661597
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028927
Never events in general practice: a focus group study exploring the views of English and Scottish general practitioners of 'never events'
Abstract
Objectives: To examine general practitioner (GP) understanding of the never event (NE) concept in general practice, and to identify potential enablers and barriers to implementation in UK general practice.
Design: Qualitative study using focus groups. The data were analysed thematically and were informed by the normalisation process theory.
Setting: General practice in Northwest England and Southwest Scotland.
Participants: 25 GPs took part in five focus groups. 13 GPs were female and 12 male with an age range of 28-60.
Results: The NE approach of avoiding serious preventable adverse outcomes from healthcare fitted with participants expectations of the delivery of care but the implementation of strategies to prevent the specific NE was considered complex and variable. The main themes identified participants' understandings and perceived limitations of the NE concept; the embedded layers of responsibility to implement NE within practices and the work required for implementation within general practices. Participants' accounts highlighted the differential nature of work in general practice and that the implementation of initiatives to address specific NE should be situated within a learning and systems approach to implementation. Some NEs were considered more relevant and amenable to simple solutions than others which could influence implementation.
Conclusions: The NE concept was considered overall an important approach to help address key primary care patient safety issues. The utility of individual NEs may vary depending on the complexity of the initiatives that would be needed to manage related risks to as low as reasonably practicable.
Keywords: United Kingdom; focus group; never events; patient safety; primary care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Carson-Stevens A, Hibbert P, Williams H, et al. Characterising the nature of primary care patient safety incident reports in the England and Wales National Reporting and Learning System: a mixed-methods agenda-setting study for general practice. Health Services and Delivery Research 2016;4:1–76. 10.3310/hsdr04270 - DOI - PubMed
-
- NHS Scotland. Welcome to the Scottish Patient Safety Programme. 2018. http://www.scottishpatientsafetyprogramme.scot.nhs.uk/programme
-
- Health Foundation. Learning report: Safer Patients Initiative, 2011:1–40.
-
- Health Foundation. Evidence scan: levels of harm. 2014. http://www.health.org.uk/publications/levels-of-harm/
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources