Dosing errors of empirical antibiotics in critically ill patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: A prospective observational study
- PMID: 31341455
- PMCID: PMC6619455
Dosing errors of empirical antibiotics in critically ill patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: A prospective observational study
Abstract
Background: Effective antibiotic therapy is crucial in sepsis management. Studies have emphasized on antibiotic administration timing more than dosing. We evaluated the frequency and risk factors of antibiotic dosing errors in sepsis.
Materials and methods: This prospective observational study compared the doses of intravenous empirical antibiotics in the 1st day of sepsis diagnosis with those recommended by Micromedex, considering sepsis source and glomerular filtration rate estimated by the modification of diet in renal disease equation. The doses were classified as under-dosed, over-dosed, or appropriate. We excluded antibiotics which did not need a dose adjustment. The under-dosing rate was retrospectively evaluated according to the creatinine clearance estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation.
Results: Between October 1, 2013, and April 30, 2014, 189 patients were evaluated (age 61.6 ± 18.6 years, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score 22.8 ± 7.0, 58.7% septic shock) with 415 antibiotic prescriptions (2.2 ± 0.9 prescriptions per patient). Antibiotic dosing was appropriate in 50.8% of patients; under-dosing in 30.7% and overdosing in 25.9%. Under-dosing prevalence was 39.4% when kidney function was assessed by the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Vancomycin was associated with the highest under-dosing rate (39.4%), followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (12.1%). The cohort mortality was 35.4%. Age, shock, chronic kidney disease, and cirrhosis independently predicted mortality on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Antibiotic dosing error was not associated with mortality: Over-versus appropriate dosing (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-3.47), under-versus appropriate dosing (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.24-1.35).
Conclusions: Antibiotic dosing errors were common in patients with sepsis. Vancomycin had the highest under-dosing rate. Antibiotic dosing errors were not associated with increased mortality.
Keywords: Antimicrobial; critical care; dose; medication error; sepsis.
Figures
References
-
- Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA. 2009;302:2323–9. - PubMed
-
- Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the united states:Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303–10. - PubMed
-
- Ferrer R, Artigas A, Levy MM, Blanco J, González-Díaz G, Garnacho-Montero J, et al. Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in spain. JAMA. 2008;299:2294–303. - PubMed
-
- Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1589–96. - PubMed
-
- Harbarth S, Garbino J, Pugin J, Romand JA, Lew D, Pittet D, et al. Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy for severe sepsis. Am J Med. 2003;115:529–35. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous