Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 1;9(3):317-326.
doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v9i3Jun.730. eCollection 2019 Jun.

A Semi-Automatic Algorithm for Estimating Cobb Angle

Affiliations

A Semi-Automatic Algorithm for Estimating Cobb Angle

Safari A et al. J Biomed Phys Eng. .

Abstract

Background: Scoliosis is the most common type of spinal deformity. A universal and standard method for evaluating scoliosis is Cobb angle measurement, but several studies have shown that there is intra- and inter- observer variation in measuring cobb angle manually.

Objective: Develop a computer- assisted system to decrease operator-dependent errors in Cobb angle measurement.

Methods: The spinal cord in the given x-ray image of the spine is highlighted using contract-stretching technique. The overall structural curvature of the spine is determined by a semi-automatic algorithm aided by the operator. Once the morphologic curve of the spine is determined, in the last step the cobb-angle is estimated by calculating the angle between two normal lines to the spinal curve at the inflection points of the curve.

Results: Evaluation results of the developed algorithms using 14 radiographs of patients ( 4 - 40 years old) with cobb angle ranges from 34 - 82 degrees, revealed that the developed algorithm accurately estimated cobb angle. Statistical analysis showed that average angle values estimated using the developed method and that provided by experts are statistically equal. The correlation coefficient between the angle values estimated using the developed algorithm and those provided by the expert is 0.81.

Conclusion: Compared with previous algorithms, the developed system is easy to use, less operator-dependent, accurate, and reliable. The obtained results are promising and show that the developed computer-based system could be used to quantify scoliosis by measuring Cobb angle.

Keywords: Curve-fitting; Scoliosis; Spinal Curvature Measurement; Cobb-angle Measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure1
Figure1
Comparison of a healthy patient with one with scoliosis (available from: http://www.sierraneurosurgery.com/procedures-and-expertise/adult-scoliosis/.)
Figure2
Figure2
Manual method for measuring the Cobb-angle (available from: https://www.spinemd.com/news-philanthropy/scoliosis-measurements).
Figure3
Figure3
Phases of Cobb-angle estimation
Figure4
Figure4
Applying piecewise linear transformation functions to image brightness [22].
Figure5
Figure5
a) original image (left), b) processed image (right)
Figure6
Figure6
Example of a 5-th order polynomial curve fitting for the spinal curvature
Figure7
Figure7
Cobb-angle measurement using tangent equations
Figure8
Figure8
Type of spinal curvature: more than one y for one x

References

    1. Adam C, Dougherty G. Applications of medical image processing in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal deformity. Medical Image Processing: Springer; 2011. p. 227.
    1. Herring J*A. Tachdjian’s Pediatric Orthopaedics E-Book: From the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
    1. Asher M*A, Strippgen W*E, Heinig C*F, Carson W*L. Isola spinal implant system. Semin Spine Surg. 1992;4:175–81.
    1. Jaeger U, Koenig R, Gieseke J, Wagner U, Kandyba J, Ostertun B, editors . MR total spine projection in juvenile scoliosis: an alternative to radiographic follow-up. Radiology; 1998: RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMER 20TH AND NORTHAMPTON STS, EASTON, PA 18042 USA .
    1. Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach C*M. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1587–92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0401-3. [ PMC Free Article] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources